AI Rate Professor

English

Victoria Tulacro

ENGL450 · ENGL1A · ENG475 · ENGLISH7D · ENGLISH1C · ENGLISH1A · ENG7E · ENGL7A · ENGLISH475 · ENG7D · ENG450 · ENG1C · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
54.55%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take her if you want a supportive English teacher and , and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and supportiveStrong writing feedbackDiscussion and reading heavySometimes nitpicky graderEngaging in person
  • Most in-person students describe her as caring, energetic, and .
  • Online reviews are more mixed, with praise for feedback but and .
  • Getting an A is realistic, but stronger , and attention to writing details.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

A grades are common, but students still describe reading, journals, discussions, and as real work.

, while in-person evidence suggests effort is rewarded more predictably.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

63/100

The writing courses are approachable with her support, but , and .

Online courses feel heavier because of reading and discussion boards, while because lectures and interaction help.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Reviews do not prove a strict attendance rule, but and paying attention matter.

Online reviews emphasize weekly participation work, while and grades.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

and writing growth, though several online students warn about nitpicky grading.

, while online recommendations are mixed and more dependent on tolerance for .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

but detail-oriented, with several online students calling her tough or nitpicky on papers.

Format shift

Online reviews contain the strongest tough-grader complaints, while in-person .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The , and writing, but many students find it manageable if they keep up.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly reading and discussion work more often, while assignments.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students most often praise her as caring, energetic, passionate, and reviews.

Format shift

, while online teaching feedback is mixed but still includes strong praise for care and feedback.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment appears , and occasional quizzes rather than major exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussions, journals, papers, and timed quizzes, while and class work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are strongly positive, emphasizing energy, care, humor, and practical writing help.

Main concern

The class is not effortless and , and steady writing work.

What students said

“I would take her class 100 times with a heartbeat.”
ENGL1A
“You will learn a lot without dreading going to class.”
ENGLISH1A
“she is not easy though.”
ENGL450

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are split between students who felt supported and and reading-heavy.

Main concern

Online students most and workload.

What students said

“The , and the time commitment was manageable.”
ENGL7A
“she finds the and ”
ENGLISH1C
“every week you have assigned readings, a .”
ENG1C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mainly support an assignment-heavy English course with at least one online timed quiz, but they do not clearly prove a .

Timed QuizAssignment-FocusedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, midterms, or finals.

Online

Online reviews mention weekly timed quizzes in one course but do not clearly .

Timed QuizWeekly ReadingsDiscussion Posts
“every week you have assigned readings, a .”
ENG1C

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I would take her class 100 times with a heartbeat.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“ and definitely made me a better writer.”

⚖️

55/100

“she finds the and ”

👍 Recommendation Rate

76/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she genuinely cares about students' success.
  • Made learning fun and interesting.
  • she is very passionate about the subject she teaches

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She marks you down on every little thing and .
  • At first it seemed like alot of work for the semester, it added up to 1,000 points but .
  • She is a very good teacher that loves to interact with her students; she is not easy though.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • Just communicate with her if you have any issues she is so understanding and caring person.
  • she wants you to succeed.
  • she's willing to help if you ask!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The evidence is credible because it includes 21 reviews across many years with consistent praise and clearly repeated concerns.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG4503 reviews
ENGL1A3 reviews
ENGL7A3 reviews
ENGLISH1A3 reviews
ENG4752 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ENG1C1 review
ENG7D1 review
ENG7E1 review
ENGL4501 review
ENGLISH1C1 review
ENGLISH4751 review
ENGLISH7D1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1