AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Patricia Gomez

ETHN6 · ETHN3 · ETHN1 · 59 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
15%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid unless she is your only option and , and minimal support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy ReadingDisorganized CanvasSlow GradingStrict DeadlinesPoor Email Support
  • Most students warn against taking her because the workload feels far beyond the course value.
  • Grades can still be high, but students describe the A as stressful and time-consuming.
  • Online and in-person reviews , and little support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Some students earn A grades, but they describe exhausting reading, strict deadlines, vague instructions, and little help as the real cost.

Both formats show possible A grades, but online reviews stress fast-track workload while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The content may be understandable, but the volume of , and unclear expectations makes the course feel difficult.

Online reviews focus on Canvas and pacing problems, while and lecture issues.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

, but strict deadlines, no late work, and limited flexibility dominate the comments.

and no late work, while online evidence mainly shows rigid deadlines and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend avoiding her because they feel unsupported, overworked, and .

Both formats are strongly negative, with only a few older online .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly call her a and , and no late work make outcomes stressful.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize late or surprising grades, while and lack of flexibility.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Reviews repeatedly mention , and long lectures.

Format shift

Online fast-track courses are described as especially intense, and in-person classes are also described as abnormal amounts of work.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most students describe her teaching as , and hard to rely on.

Format shift

Online criticism centers on Canvas and email support, while , and strict policies.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Comments emphasize reading summaries, discussions, papers, projects, videos, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Both formats appear assignment-heavy, with online students mentioning lecture quizzes and discussion posts more often.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students report excessive work, strict policies, hard-to-follow lectures, and discomfort expressing opinions.

Main concern

Students say class time and , and unsupportive.

What students said

“ homework.”
ETHN-6
“No devices are allowed and we can't access the .”
ETHN-3
“ worth it”
ETHN-1

Remote format

Online

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe heavy , and weak email support.

Main concern

The online workload and .

What students said

“The workload is insane, and shes a .”
ETHN-6
“ , as if she did it with her eyes closed.”
ETHN-6
“ .”
ETHN-1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, tests, and a , but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam PolicyLecture QuizzesFinal ProjectDiscussion Posts

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and strict class practices, but they do not clearly prove the exam format or .

Tests MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“I didnt know my final grades or .”
ETHN-3

Online

and a , but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Lecture QuizzesFinal ProjectPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“She had assigned over 5 hours of .”
ETHN-6
“ and recieved a zero for no reason”
ETHN-1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you literally have no other option, but if anything, just push it for another semester.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“ , as if she did it with her eyes closed.”

⚖️

18/100

“ and recieved a zero for no reason which dropped my grade from an A to a B.”

📚 Workload

12/100

“The workload is insane, and shes a .”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • homework.
  • This class will take up an abnormal amount of time with all the videos and .
  • If you take the 8 week class be ready to read, write and watch lectures nonstop.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures have little value and are very long.
  • Professor gomez isn't understanding and much help, he ignores emails and isn't open to your opinions if they aren't on her side.
  • Does not accept late work and .

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

  • .
  • worth it
  • if you literally have no other option

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

59

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 recent reviews across both formats show very , and support.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 55
2 out of 54
1 out of 545

Course coverage

ETHN-624 reviews
ETHN-118 reviews
ETHN-38 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

50 reported outcomes

A range

23

A+ 7 · A 10 · A- 6

B range

15

B+ 6 · B 6 · B- 3

C range

4

C+ 3 · C- 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 4