AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Sarah Armstrong-Rocha

STAT10 · MATH410931 · 65B · MATH425 · MATH65A · CALC65B · MATH4 · MATH65B · MATH420 · STATS10 · MATH31 · MATH61 · MATH75 · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
60.53%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you can , and a classroom style that some students find harsh.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear but strictHeavy homeworkExtra creditAttendance mattersPolarizing attitude
  • and study guides, but recent reviews describe rude or rigid classroom behavior.
  • The workload is consistently heavy, with and .
  • and clear review materials can help prepared students earn strong grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A , and , but students repeatedly describe strict grading, heavy work, and difficult exams.

Online reviews make the A feel harder because support is weaker, while and study guides can improve outcomes.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

The math and statistics content is manageable for prepared students, but , and required methods make it challenging.

Online students report fewer helpful examples, while material understandable.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as important, and several students say missing or leaving class creates problems.

The strict attendance evidence is mainly from in-person reviews, while online and communication.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Students , but many others warn against her attitude, workload, and .

Online reviews are mostly hesitant or negative, while and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

She offers , but students often call her a her exact method.

Format shift

Strict grading appears in both formats, with online students especially frustrated by formatting and .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

daily assignments, long packets, and work that can take hours.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy work, with online reviews emphasizing time-consuming assignments that do not match lectures.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

and organized, but the experience is dragged down by repeated complaints about sarcasm, rigidity, and rude treatment.

Format shift

, while online teaching gets more criticism for communication and examples.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades , and study-guide preparation.

Format shift

, while online reviews mention exams but less complete grading structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly mixed, with many older students praising clear lectures and while newer students , and rude behavior.

Main concern

The biggest risk is a rigid, high-control class environment with and exams.

What students said

“She is an amazing professor, her lectures are amazing, you don't want to miss a day, you would miss a lot.”
STATS10
“ and does not allow any notes or flash cards for .”
STAT10

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative about heavy , and slow or rude communication.

Main concern

and weak support.

What students said

“Her class takes up so much time and feels never ending.”
STAT10
“She does not care about her students. .”
MATH65B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe exam-heavy grading with no cheat sheets or flash cards, difficult exams, and limited time in some online exams.

No Cheat SheetsExam HeavyDifficult ExamsTimed Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews clearly describe difficult, exam-heavy assessments with no notes, flash cards, or cheat sheets allowed.

No Cheat SheetsNo Flash CardsExam HeavyDifficult Exams
“ and does not allow any notes or flash cards for .”
STAT10
“ however if you study the review you will do fine.”
STAT10

Online

Online reviews mention exams with too many graphing problems in limited time, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Timed ExamsTest Heavy
“There are so many problems to graph in such a short period of time.”
MATH65B
“ .”
MATH31

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Take her class because its really good. This class also takes up a good amount of time!”

Voice snapshots generated from 38 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom tone; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

60/100

“Her lectures were really good and helped me understand the work she gave us.”

⚖️

32/100

“She is indeed a .”

📚 Workload

24/100

“Her class takes up so much time and feels never ending.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • exactly what's going to be on the test.
  • She treated you as elementary students.
  • Very sarcastic in a rude way and makes the classroom environment very uncomfortable.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She gives opportunities for so !!
  • ! !
  • and go early because you can get .

Theme 3

⏱️

  • This class also takes up a good amount of time!
  • so be prepared to learn.
  • If you miss a lecture you miss important information and are likely to fail.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

38

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 38 detailed reviews across many years, with , and polarized teaching style.

Inside 38 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 55
1 out of 510

Course coverage

STAT1011 reviews
MATH315 reviews
Math-614 reviews
STATS104 reviews
CALC65B3 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MATH4253 reviews
MATH65B2 reviews
65B1 review
Math-751 review
MATH41 review
MATH4109311 review
MATH4201 review
MATH65A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

35 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 5 · A 9 · A- 1

B range

10

B+ 4 · B 5 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

3

D+ 2 · D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1