AI Rate Professor

English

Mia Bachman

ENGL1A · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you are comfortable with disability and and mainly want a low-difficulty English course.

Best fit · Effort For RewardSimple WorkloadUnconventional TopicsUneven OrganizationReading And PapersLow Recommendation
  • The class is usually easy to pass, but students split sharply on whether the topics and structure feel worthwhile.
  • Online reviews describe simple work with some reading and papers, while and teaching.
  • reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Grades are mostly A-range and the workload is often described as simple, but effortless A.

Online evidence shows easy completion with some frustrating point weighting, while but still says the workload is easy.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

The course content appears light and introductory, though the themes can feel unconventional or sensitive to some students.

and manageable work, while in-person reviews also call the workload easy but question the topic selection.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews mention participation but do not clearly prove a .

Online and in-person reviews both mention participation, but neither format clearly .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Recommendation is weak because several students question the class structure, topic fit, and overall value despite easy grades.

Online reviews are mixed and sometimes positive, while but more negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

The grade outcomes are high and students describe simple work, but .

Format shift

Online reviews show high grades with complaints about points, while separate grading pattern.

Workload

Light

76/100

Most comments describe little reading or easy workload, though some mention papers and .

Format shift

Online reviews range from very simple to reading-heavy, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Students report a mixed experience, with some calling her chill and others criticizing organization and value.

Format shift

, while and mostly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews mainly , and modules rather than exams.

Format shift

Online evidence points to writing and discussion work, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Budget First

but more negative, with one review calling the workload easy and another strongly warning against the class.

Main concern

The main concern is whether the and book cost.

What students said

“Workload is easy however the selection of topics discussed are unconventional.”
ENGL-1A
“ if you respect yourself and your time.”
ENGL-1A

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students usually found the class simple, but some disliked the and late module posting.

Main concern

The main concern is uneven organization and .

What students said

“Not a lot of .”
ENGL-1A
“The so off and its unmotivating to complete any of the work”
ENGL-1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, quiz format, midterm format, or final format.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The so off and its unmotivating to complete any of the work”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in workload, topic fit, and organization; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“she doesn't always upload modules on time but super simple class”

📈 Easy Grade Path

82/100

“Not a lot of .”

⚖️ Work Value

78/100

“The so off and its unmotivating to complete any of the work”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Not a lot of .
  • Workload is easy however the selection of topics discussed are unconventional.

Theme 2

🧭 About Course Fit

  • If those are sensitive topics for you, I suggest choosing another professor.
  • Her English 1A class is built on teaching and writing about queer history and being disabled.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • she doesn't always upload modules on time but super simple class
  • if you respect yourself and your time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Seven recent reviews give useful signals, but several are vague or emotionally charged and only two are in person.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENGL-1A7 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 3 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Audit/No Grade 1 · Rather not say 1