AI Rate Professor

American Sign Language

Kendra Rose

ASL1 · ASL102 · ASL2 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you can handle heavy independent online work and do .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing online experienceHeavy weekly workloadGreat lecture videosSlow communicationNot beginner friendly
  • Reviews are split between and students who warn strongly against the online workload.
  • Online ASL2 complaints describe 12 to 24 assignments per week and fast videos that feel too advanced.
  • The , but the evidence base is almost entirely online.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

Grades can be good, but online students report , and possible grading issues that raise the effort cost.

Online evidence shows mixed grade effort, while the single .

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

ASL content is manageable for some ASL1 students but ASL2 online is repeatedly described as advanced, fast, and not beginner friendly.

Online ASL2 reviews drive the lower score, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews mention participation and online assignments but do .

Online evidence focuses on weekly work and participation, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation is split because some students praise her resources and videos while and poor communication.

Online reviews are sharply divided, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Some students earned A grades, but , and poor review of materials make grading feel risky.

Format shift

Online reviews contain the grading concerns, while the .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Multiple online reviews describe 12 to 24 assignments a week and call the workload ridiculous or stressful.

Format shift

Online reviews strongly support a heavy workload, while the .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Her lecture videos and organization help some students, but , and confusing course design hurt the experience.

Format shift

Online teaching is polarizing, while the .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Reviews , and many weekly assignments more than major exams.

Format shift

Online reviews provide assignment and quiz evidence, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The and describes her as caring, inspirational, and effective.

Main concern

There is , so the format-specific confidence is low.

What students said

“ , and passionate about teaching her students ASL.”
ASL2

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with praise for lecture videos but repeated , and limited feedback.

Main concern

The biggest risk is a heavy weekly workload with inconsistent communication.

What students said

“15-24 assignments a week”
ASL2
“She doesn't look over her materials so make sure your getting a fair grade.”
ASL1
“All of her lecture PowerPoints include video explanations, which makes the material very easy to follow and understand.”
ASL1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because reviews mention quizzes and but do not clearly prove exam format or proctoring rules.

Small QuizzesVideo AssignmentsTest Heavy In One Review

Assessment risk

Varies

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, video assignments, and test-heavy work, but they do not clearly prove webcam, .

Small QuizzesVideo AssignmentsTest Heavy In One Review
“You also have Video assignments Small quizzes fill in the blank or multiple choice.”
ASL1
“Lots of homework”
ASL2
“Test heavy”
ASL2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, communication, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“All of her lecture PowerPoints include video explanations, which makes the material very easy to follow and understand.”

⚖️ Workload Risk

24/100

“15-24 assignments a week”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“This professor is a gem. You would not be disappointed.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lecture videos are great.
  • She rarely provided was not helpful.
  • , and passionate about teaching her students ASL.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • The workload was ridiculous and was not beginner-friendly AT ALL.
  • 12-20 assignments a week.
  • If you're dedicated, then you'll pass the class.

Theme 3

📩 About Communication

  • .
  • Most of the , but not quickly.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is moderately credible because 12 reviews span 2020 to 2026, but only one review is in person and opinions are highly split.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ASL26 reviews
ASL15 reviews
ASL1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1