AI Rate Professor

Physics

Kevin Osorno

PHYS45 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
85/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you participate and can tolerate some disorganization, because the grading and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging lecturesLenient test gradingParticipation mattersOften lateStudent-friendly exams
  • Most students recommend him because lectures are engaging, question-friendly, and supportive.
  • His grading is often described as lenient, with , and .
  • The main weakness is organization, , and shifting expectations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

74/100

Grades require physics effort and participation, but , and make the reward fair.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

47/100

Physics 45 is not easy and can move fast, but students say questions, reviews, and engaging lectures help manage it.

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Participation matters and students are pushed to ask questions, but reviews do .

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

85/100

Most students recommend him because he is engaging, patient with questions, and flexible with .

; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students cite partial credit, curves, test corrections, late work acceptance, and as .

Format shift

All grading evidence is from in-person PHYS-45 reviews.

Workload

Moderate

54/100

The , and test preparation, but students do not describe it as overwhelming overall.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students describe him as engaging, patient, humorous, and helpful, though some note mistakes, lateness, and disorganization.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

74/100

Reviews focus heavily on , and class participation.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

All reviewed evidence is in person, , and repeated issues with lateness and organization.

Main concern

The biggest concern is disorganization and late schedule or grade handling.

What students said

“Lectures were engaging, interesting, and .”
PHYS-45
“Class a sometimes started late or changed with short notice, an , and grades were posted extremely late.”
PHYS-45

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are student-friendly because students mention , and partial credit.

Equation SheetOne-Sided Handwritten NotesCurved TestsTest CorrectionsPartial Credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly mention student-friendly test supports, but do not clearly prove webcam, online proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book exams.

Equation SheetOne-Sided Handwritten NotesCurved TestsTest CorrectionsPartial Credit
“Gives students an equation sheet for to use.”
PHYS-45
“ and .”
PHYS-45

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Loved having this professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Lectures were engaging, interesting, and .”

⚖️

82/100

“ and .”

⚠️ Organization Risk

45/100

“The syllabus was confusing and to understand expectations or know how we were doing.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great professor. Loves answering questions, sharing cool off-topic physics facts, and is humorous.
  • Professor Osorno was an engaging lecturer, always asking the students questions and giving them problems to solve.

Theme 2

📈 About Exams And Grades

  • He is a and explain your reasoning but he does give partial work on tests!
  • Gives students an equation sheet for to use.
  • He accepts late work.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • Usually 15 mins late for lecture and very late for lab.
  • an , and grades were posted extremely late.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

and mostly consistent, but the sample is small and limited to one course format.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHYS-456 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

3

B+ 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1