AI Rate Professor

Psychology

John Glass

PSYCH1 · PSYCH5 · PSYCH55 · PSYCH25 · PSYCH41 · 51 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
86.54%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want an engaging psychology professor and can keep up with , and written work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging lecturesClear feedbackExtra creditReading requiredMixed online quality
  • Most students strongly praise Glass for , and useful feedback.
  • The course is usually manageable and often grade-friendly, but students , and note taking.
  • A minority of online reviews report unclear instructions, weak lecture coverage, or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Many students earn A grades and call the work manageable or easy, but , and note taking still require steady effort.

Online evidence includes both easy-A praise and , while in-person evidence more often says grades are easy with attendance and effort.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Psychology content can be reading-heavy or conceptually tough, but , and engaging.

Online courses can feel more self-directed and textbook-heavy, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

reviews stressing lecture attendance and online reviews requiring self-paced discipline.

Online reviews focus on time management and deadlines, while and taking notes matter.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Most students recommend him because he is engaging, supportive, knowledgeable, and .

, while online reviews are still strong but include more complaints about clarity and materials.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Students often mention fair rubrics, , redos, and , though some call him tough or unclear.

Format shift

Online grading is more mixed, while as fair when students attend and study.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

The workload usually , and papers, but most students call it manageable.

Format shift

Online sections can feel heavier because of textbook reading and videos, while and .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Most reviews describe him as , and effective at making psychology meaningful.

Format shift

In-person teaching is praised most consistently, while online teaching is strong overall but has .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessments combine exams, quizzes, discussions, case studies, papers, and personal development exercises depending on the course.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, exams, case studies, and papers, while , and discussions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

as , and memorable, with lectures that make psychology practical and interesting.

Main concern

Attendance, note taking, textbook reading, and .

What students said

“TAKE HIS CLASS.”
PSYCH1
“there is alot of note taking and and simple”
PSYCH1
“You will definitely get an A if you put your time into it.”
PSYCH25

Remote format

Online

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly very positive, with strong organization and feedback, but a and heavy reliance on videos or textbook reading.

Main concern

Online sections can require strong time management and .

What students said

“Uses Honorlock (web monitor only).”
PSYCH1
“Overall easy A.”
PSYCH55
“You are on your own.”
PSYCH25

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and exams, one explicit Honorlock web-monitor note, and several comments saying exams are manageable with study.

Textbook-Based ExamsQuizzes And ExamsHonorlock Web MonitorNon-Cumulative Exams In Some Sections

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and some easy or non-cumulative exams, but do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book rules.

Lecture-Based ExamsPlanned TestsNon-Cumulative Tests In One Review
“ and simple and everything on the ”
PSYCH1
“4 test non-cumulative”
PSYCH25
“ . in order to study for the test.”
PSYCH1

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention Honorlock web monitor in one course, textbook-based exams, chapter exams, quizzes, and .

Honorlock Web MonitorTextbook-Based ExamsChapter ExamsQuizzes
“Uses Honorlock (web monitor only).”
PSYCH1
“The ”
PSYCH55
“We had an exam for every 3 chapters”
PSYCH1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Glass truly is one of .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“He made every lecture interesting, engaging, and easy to understand”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“ !!!”

⚖️

76/100

“as long as you follow his directions, he grades fairly.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are informative, enlightening, and fun!
  • The video lectures were engaging and fascinating.
  • He made the class very interesting and easy to engage in.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload And Exams

  • Overall workload is medium.
  • There is a lot of writing assignments, but they are rather simple.
  • Read, study and be on top of and you will pass.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • You are on your own.
  • The .
  • he is a and assigns a lot of meticulous assignments

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

51

Lifetime ratings

93/100

Evidence confidence

The 50 reviews span online and in-person formats, recent and older courses, and include enough detail to balance strong praise against recurring workload and clarity complaints.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 543
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PSYCH118 reviews
PSYCH2516 reviews
PSYCH417 reviews
PSYCH557 reviews
PSYCH52 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

33

A+ 11 · A 21 · A- 1

B range

10

B+ 4 · B 5 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Rather not say 3