AI Rate Professor

English

Bonnie Khaw-Posthuma

ENGL32 · ENG1A · ENGLISH1A · 1A · ENGLISH · ENG475 · ENGLISH1A1B · ENGL1C · ENGLISH75A · ENGLISH1AHON · ENGL1B · ENG74 · ENGLISH1B · ENGL1A · ENGL6224 · ENG1B · ENGLI1A · ENG450 · ENG1C · 61 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Take her if , and participation in exchange for and a generally manageable English class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful feedbackEssay heavyRepetitive lecturesParticipation focusedMixed grading
  • Students often find the course content easy, but essays and .
  • Recent reviews are , and clear weekly expectations.
  • Older , and repetitive class discussions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic for students who complete essays, discussions, and participation, but and the workload is not always light.

Online evidence is more workload-sensitive, while if students show up and do the writing.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The material is usually understandable and often repetitive, though English essays, readings, and presentations add steady demands.

Online reviews mention heavier reading and discussion boards, while or predictable.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Some reviews mention flexible schedules or excused absences, but others describe participation, punctuality, and attendance as important.

Online flexibility is mostly about late-work rules, while and participation expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

and manageable assignments, but repeated complaints about boredom, repetition, and .

Recent online and in-person reviews are more favorable, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and forgiving to tough and subjective, so as fair but inconsistent.

Format shift

Online reviews include both forgiving grading and tough-grader complaints, while and .

Workload

Moderate

54/100

The workload usually , and occasional oral reports, with some classes feeling heavy.

Format shift

Online reviews report more weekly discussion boards and , while as moderate and predictable.

Teaching experience

Average

64/100

She is often helpful, caring, and clear, but many students also describe lectures as boring, repetitive, or disorganized.

Format shift

Online reviews praise feedback and clarity, while teaching and repetitive classroom style.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment is mainly essays, journals, discussions, oral reports, and papers rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments, with online reviews adding quizzes and discussion boards.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe an easy-to-standard English class with lots of , and but recurring complaints about repetition and grading.

Main concern

Students who dislike discussion, oral work, or repetitive lectures may get frustrated.

What students said

“She accepts all late work and she's an .”
ENG1A
“She was demanding and tedious about her lectures, works, and essays/journals.”
ENG1B

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed, with and clarity in some classes but , and stricter late-work rules in others.

Main concern

Online workload can be heavy and late-work flexibility is inconsistent.

What students said

“You have 2 discussion posts every week based off the , and 4 essays including an 8-10 page research paper!”
ENGLISH75A
“Professor gave and was very ”
ENGL1C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam policy, and assessment appears mostly paper- and .

Essay-based assessmentFinal mentionedQuizzes mentionedNo clear proctoring evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mainly describe essays, journals, oral reports, and a final, but do .

EssaysOral reportFinal mentionedNo clear closed-book evidence
“ .”
1A
“There are .”
ENGLISH1B

Online

, and a final, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Quizzes mentionedEssaysDiscussion boardsNo clear proctoring evidence
“There are 3 big essays you gotta do, as well as the final.”
ENG1A
“You have 2 discussion posts every week based off the , and 4 essays including an 8-10 page research paper!”
ENGLISH75A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She accepts all late work and she's an . Great class with fun discussions and fun readings. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and participation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

64/100

“Professor Khaw makes her course very easy to comprehend.”

📚 Workload Reality

54/100

“You have 2 discussion posts every week based off the , and 4 essays including an 8-10 page research paper!”

⚖️

55/100

“ , but fair.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Gives you plenty of .
  • She repeats herself a lot and can be a .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • To get an A, however, is a little more difficult.
  • She is seriously the .

Theme 3

🗣️ About Participation

  • Every class sesh has a group discussion.
  • and punctuality.
  • If you show up and show that you care, she will notice.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

61

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years and both formats give strong evidence, though older comments are more negative than recent ones.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 512
3 out of 514
2 out of 514
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1B8 reviews
ENG1A7 reviews
ENGL1A5 reviews
1A4 reviews
ENG1C4 reviews
Show 14 more courses
ENG4503 reviews
ENGL1B3 reviews
ENGL1C2 reviews
ENGLISH2 reviews
ENGLISH1B2 reviews
ENGLISH75A2 reviews
ENG4751 review
ENG741 review
ENGL321 review
ENGL62241 review
ENGLI1A1 review
ENGLISH1A1 review
ENGLISH1A1B1 review
ENGLISH1AHON1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

9

A 5 · A- 4

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1