AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Michelle Ries

CJ2 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

Take Ries if you want a .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyAmazing lecturesKind and understandingEasy workloadManageable homeworkPassionate teaching
  • Students describe Ries as kind, pleasant, passionate, and .
  • The workload is light and manageable, with , and a .
  • All evidence is from in-person classes, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

An A looks very attainable because students report very low difficulty and , though there is still a paper and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

The course seems easy to follow because lectures are enjoyable and assignments are described as pretty easy and manageable.

Only in-person evidence exists, so .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

Reviews mention participation but do not clearly prove that .

, and online evidence does not exist.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students unanimously recommend Ries because , and makes the class manageable.

The .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

86/100

Grades look lenient because all students report low difficulty and mostly A-level outcomes with manageable work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

88/100

Homework is described as pretty easy and manageable, with , and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students praise her enjoyable lectures, kindness, understanding, and genuine passion for the subject.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment includes quizzes, discussion boards, one research paper, and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students report enjoyable lectures, an easy workload, and a supportive professor who cares about students' futures.

Main concern

The sample is small, and and participation.

What students said

“Very pleasant and enjoyable lectures. and understanding. Would 100% recommend her.”
CJ-2
“ , but it's pretty easy and manageable.”
CJ-2
“ , and .”
CJ-2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and a , but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or .

Final ExamNo MidtermQuiz Format Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention quizzes, discussion boards, one research paper, a final exam, and , but .

Final ExamNo MidtermQuizzes
“ , but it's pretty easy and manageable.”
CJ-2
“ , and .”
CJ-2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very pleasant and enjoyable lectures. and understanding. Would 100% recommend her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“Very pleasant and enjoyable lectures. and understanding.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“Would 100% recommend her.”

📈 Workload Fit

88/100

“ , but it's pretty easy and manageable.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very pleasant and enjoyable lectures. and understanding.
  • Really good
  • Professor Ries had an amazing class and also had a genuine passion for the subject she was teaching

Theme 2

📚 About Workload And Exams

  • , but it's pretty easy and manageable.
  • , and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Three recent reviews are consistent and positive, but the small sample limits certainty.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CJ-23 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values