AI Rate Professor

Business

Carol Williams

BUSOT40B · BUSOT40A · COMPWORD · BUSTEC452 · COMP40 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

Take Williams if you value a and and some slow or repetitive teaching.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring mentorEasy A potentialRequired attendanceBoring at timesHands-on class work
  • as caring, encouraging, and helpful.
  • Several students say the class is easy, but teaching quality can feel boring or dated.
  • , and the single online review is much less enthusiastic.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

The course can be an easy A because students describe low difficulty, , and straightforward work, though attendance and .

The Easy A , while the single online review reports an A but more friction.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

The content appears basic and manageable, especially in typing and personal finance courses, though software can add difficulty online.

, while the online review says the software made the course harder.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

At least one recent .

, while the online review does not clearly prove an attendance rule.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and encouraging, but mixed comments about boredom and online delivery limit the recommendation.

In-person students are mostly positive, while the only online student is hesitant about lectures and software.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Low difficulty ratings, , and direct Easy A comments point to lenient grading despite limited grade data.

Format shift

, while online grading evidence is limited.

Workload

Moderate

66/100

The class is easy to keep up with, but one recent review also flags lots of homework and group projects.

Format shift

, while the online review says she helps with homework but software is difficult.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

She is often described as caring and motivating, but some students find her boring, slow, or not fully prepared.

Format shift

, while online feedback is more mixed and less confident.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Comments , and class exercises rather than exams.

Format shift

, while the online review mentions homework and Zoom but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are mostly positive, highlighting care, encouragement, easy pacing, and some boring repetitive class work.

Main concern

and some students find class boring.

What students said

“ .”
BUSOT40A
“VERY BORING but def EASY A.”
BUSOT40A
“Prof Williams created an atmosphere where everyone in her class was important”
BUSOT40A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review says she is knowledgeable and but slow and not very useful in Zoom meetings.

Main concern

Online software and lectures may be frustrating.

What students said

“The software she uses is difficult also.”
BUSTEC452
“ ”
BUSTEC452

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book policy, or final structure.

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or quiz structure.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“VERY BORING but def EASY A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, recommendations, and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

Teaching Quality

78/100

“Prof Williams created an atmosphere where everyone in her class was important, everyone was learning,not only to type but to succeed.”

Recommendation Rate

72/100

“ .”

Grade Ease

84/100

“Super easy going, straight forward, very easy to keep up with.”

Theme 1

Teaching Style

  • She is a great instructor and mentor.
  • She did a good job on teaching the material.
  • She wasn't a horrible professor but she wasn't very good.

Theme 2

Difficulty and Grades

  • Super easy going, straight forward, very easy to keep up with.
  • VERY BORING but def EASY A.
  • The software she uses is difficult also.

Theme 3

Class Experience

  • .
  • The typing contests helped me learn the different letter formats.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

There are 12 reviews, but many are old, several are vague, and only one online review supports that format.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BUSOT40A7 reviews
BUSOT40B2 reviews
BUSTEC4521 review
COMP401 review
COMPWORD1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Pass 1