Alex Lemos

ACCTG1A · ACCT1B · ACCT70 · ACCTG70 · ACCT1A · ACCT211 · ACCTG1B · ACCTNG70 · ACCOUNTING1B · 68 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 77/100
RMP rating: 4.2/5
Take again: 85.71%
Difficulty: 3.0

The decision

Lemos is worth taking for self-motivated students, especially in person, but online students should expect independent work and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProReal-world examplesSelf-taught online formatExtra creditParticipation mattersPaper-heavy workload

In-person students usually praise his real-world examples, friendliness, and .
Online reviews are sharply mixed, with some students calling the class easy and and disorganized.
Grades can be strong, but success depends on self-motivation, attendance or participation, writing, and Cengage work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is reachable with consistent work, Cengage practice, papers, participation, and , but it is not effortless for everyone.

Online reviews range from easy A to stressful self-taught work, while to passing.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

Accounting concepts are manageable with his structure and examples, but online students often need to teach themselves and handle many assignments.

In-person reviews make the course sound clearer, while online reviews more often describe directionless or .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Participation and as necessary, especially for in-person classes and Zoom-based online work.

, while online reviews mention Zoom participation and weekly work.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

and , but severe online complaints lower the overall recommendation.

In-person evidence is mostly recommendable, while online evidence is mixed and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Grades are often strong and is common, though late work and weak papers can be penalized.

Format shift

because of , while online reviews include stricter no-late-work complaints.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload is moderate to heavy because students , and exams.

Format shift

Online reviews more often call the workload paper-heavy, while as manageable if students attend.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

He is praised for real-world examples and support, but online reviews include serious complaints about guidance, lectures, and .

Format shift

Teaching quality appears much stronger in person than online, where comments are polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment blends Cengage , and exams.

Format shift

Online assessment leans toward Cengage and papers, while in-person reviews emphasize participation, group questions, study guides, and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and describe him as knowledgeable, relatable, practical, and .

Main concern

, and studying for non-multiple-choice exams matter.

What students said

“This professor has made this course super easy to understand and offers many opportunities for .”
ACCT1B

“You must attend class for !”
ACCT1B

Remote format

Online

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are divided between students who find the class easy and students , and poorly guided.

Main concern

Several online students report little , and self-teaching.

What students said

“This class is an easy A if you watch the lectures and .”
ACCT1A

“Book is 100 percent needed, if you want to pass the class because the and self-teach.”
ACCT1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence suggests standard or moderately student-friendly accounting assessments, with Cengage tests online and .

Cengage Tests3 Exams MentionedStudy GuidesShort Answer ExamsUnlimited Guesses Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and exam questions drawn from in-class work, but do not prove open-book or proctoring rules.

Study GuidesShort Answer ExamsIn-Class Assignment Questions On Exams

“ those are the !”
ACCOUNTING1B

“ choice and you'll need to know the concepts to complete the questions.”
ACCT1B

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention Cengage tests and homework, including answer checking or unlimited guesses, but .

Cengage TestsAnswer Check Before SubmitUnlimited Guesses Mentioned3 Exams Mentioned

“The your answers before you submit the test.”
ACCT1A

“There is homework weekly (on cengage+1-2 pg paper), 3 exams, 1 terms paper & he offers in the end.”
ACCT1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“Prof. Lemos, not Lemons, is the best. This class prepares you for real world situations in that you need to be self motivated!”
Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“He shares his personal experiences and made the class fun.”

👍 Recommendation Level

76/100

“I would highly recommend this professor to anyone interesting in accounting and finance!”

📚 Workload Reality

45/100

“Not difficult content but a lot of work to do.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

He weaves his real world experience into the curriculum and makes the class applicable to the real world.
The live zooms he does and the material he shared with the class really helped me understand the material.
Without a doubt, the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

This class is an easy A if you watch the lectures and .
You get out of this class what you put in.
Show up, understand the material and you will be just fine.

Theme 3

🧾 About Workload & Format

Almost all the work comes from the textbook. Very quiz and paper heavy.
There is homework weekly (on cengage+1-2 pg paper), 3 exams, 1 terms paper & he offers in the end.
Attendance and participation is a must.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews include detailed, recent, and format-specific evidence, though opinions are more polarized online.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 542

4 out of 514

3 out of 52

2 out of 53

1 out of 57

Course coverage

ACCT1B20 reviews

ACCTG1B10 reviews

ACCTG707 reviews

ACCT1A6 reviews

ACCOUNTING1B2 reviews

Show 4 more courses

ACCTG1A2 reviews

ACCT2111 review

ACCT701 review

ACCTNG701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

32 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 6 · A 18

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 2

Alex Lemos

Lemos is worth taking for self-motivated students, especially in person, but online students should expect independent work and x x.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

EasyA

Standard

Mandatory

WorthIt

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

👍 Recommendation Level

📚 Workload Reality

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

🧾 About Workload & Format

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

Lemos is worth taking for self-motivated students, especially in person, but online students should expect independent work and .