AI Rate Professor

English

Josephine Lowe

ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENG475 · ENGL475 · ENGLISH1A · ENG495 · ENGLISH475 · ENGL10935 · ENG575 · ENGL495 · 1A04464 · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
85.37%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you want a and can keep up with regular writing and participation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and responsiveFair graderEssay-heavyAttendance mattersHelpful feedback
  • Most students praise Lowe as , and fair.
  • The class is , and feedback.
  • Grades are generally attainable, but , and steady work matter.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A is very reachable because grading is usually fair or generous, but students , and participation work.

Online evidence is more mixed on workload, while in person reviews and drafts.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The content is approachable for many students because Lowe gives examples and feedback, but the .

Online reviews mention manageable modules and essays, while in person reviews stress lectures, participation, and writing support.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Attendance and participation are often treated as important, and several students say skipping class hurts performance.

In person reviews provide the , while online reviews mention Zoom meetings and showing up but less consistently.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students usually recommend her because , and helps weaker writers pass.

, though online reviews include a few sharper complaints about workload and communication.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students repeatedly call her fair or and late-work flexibility, but some still describe her as strict.

Format shift

Online and in person reviews both support fair grading, with in person comments more often mentioning strict standards.

Workload

Moderate

56/100

The workload centers , and sometimes tutoring, so it is manageable but consistent.

Format shift

Online reviews more often complain about weekly work, while in person reviews frame the writing as expected but useful.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Most comments describe Lowe as , and helpful with writing.

Format shift

Both formats praise her teaching, though online reviews include a few negative comments about rudeness or frustration.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Reviews overwhelmingly , and tutoring rather than exams.

Format shift

Both online and in as the main assessment method.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person reviews strongly emphasize , and stricter attendance or participation standards.

Main concern

Students must show up, participate, complete drafts, and and writing.

What students said

“She is very strict with attendance, however, this was the .”
ENGLISH1A
“ .”
ENG575
“Prof Lowe is a strict teacher, however she does care and wants students to pass.”
1A04464

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are , and email access, with a few strong complaints about workload and tone.

Main concern

Online students sometimes found the writing volume, weekly work, or required support activities frustrating.

What students said

“I took this class for the summer, very easy. We just wrote about 4 essays and it was some basic stuff.”
ENG1A
“Very hard I probably get a C in the class. Not an easy A. .”
ENGL1A
“The class requires a lot of essay writing but is a manageable class if you do all the work you will pass.”
ENGLISH1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mainly describe essays and coursework, and they do not clearly prove a .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policyEssay-based assessmentDiscussion and draft work

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person , and tutoring, but do not clearly prove exam policy.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policyEssay draftsParticipation matters
“There's 4 essays total; 2 drafts are needed before final draft is turned in each time.”
1A04464
“you have to do the success center hours that plays a big role in and showing up as well as class participation”
ENGL475

Online

Online reviews mention essays, discussions, recorded lectures, Zoom, and modules, but .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policyEssay-based workWeekly discussions
“Easy grader, 4 essays, weekly discussions”
ENG1A
“The class requires a lot of essay writing but is a manageable class if you do all the work you will pass.”
ENGLISH1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is very strict with attendance, however, this was the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 42 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“ and understanding lectures. One of the and caring.”

⚖️

78/100

“She is a night she is on top of it.”

📚 Workload Reality

56/100

“The class requires a lot of essay writing but is a manageable class if you do all the work you will pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Dr Lowe is very fair and in the Zoom and wants to help you as a student to know how you can achieve the !
  • and understanding lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy grader, 4 essays, weekly discussions
  • Very hard I probably get a C in the class. Not an easy A. .
  • She gives and grades fairly.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • This Professor changed my life.
  • She is actually a very kind professor.
  • She understands her students and wants them to pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

42

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is based on 42 detailed reviews across many years with , and attendance.

Inside 42 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 535
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENG1A17 reviews
ENGLISH1A7 reviews
ENG4756 reviews
ENGL1A3 reviews
ENG5752 reviews
Show 6 more courses
ENGL109352 reviews
1A044641 review
ENG4951 review
ENGL4751 review
ENGL4951 review
ENGLISH4751 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

38 reported outcomes

A range

28

A+ 6 · A 15 · A- 7

B range

6

B+ 4 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1