AI Rate Professor

Physics

Hamid Mohajeri Moghaddam

PHYS44 · PHYS30A · PHYS10 · PHY44 · PHYS45 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
15.38%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you can teach yourself and mainly need a possible easy grade.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganized lecturesPoor communicationEasy examsTough grading disputesRude or intimidating
  • Many students say the class can be easy to pass, but they often learn little.
  • Repeated complaints mention , and grading problems.
  • A few students found him fair or funny, but most reviews advise avoiding him.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Several in-person students report easy or copied exams, but and grade-entry problems.

, while online evidence is much harsher and less reliable.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The course content often sounds manageable, but and mistakes make learning harder than the material itself.

but , while online reviews focus more on poor structure and support.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

because students mention roll, in-class assignments, participation, and skip-class warnings.

, while online reviews do not clearly prove an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

because they describe poor teaching, weak communication, and .

Both formats are negative, but online reviews are especially severe about communication and grading.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Some students report easy exams and fair boosts, but , and arbitrary mark-downs.

Format shift

but sometimes lenient, while online grading is repeatedly described as harsh.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload varies from easy guide-based exams , and many papers.

Format shift

In-person reviews show the widest range, while and .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Students repeatedly describe lectures as , and discouraging when they ask questions.

Format shift

Both formats criticize teaching quality, with online reviews adding poor technology use and email response.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention homework, labs, in-class assignments, papers, and .

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most assessment detail, while online .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but mostly criticize , rude responses, and disorganization.

Main concern

Students may pass while still feeling unsupported and confused.

What students said

“Easy A, but you won't learn anything.”
PHYS45
“ and will randomly change due dates without telling the students.”
PHYS44

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, especially about email silence, technology problems, and .

Main concern

Students say online support and .

What students said

“ use technology.”
PHY44
“He is a and does not have a .”
PHYS44

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

problems, but comments do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Homework-like examsGuide-based examsEasy exams reportedExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and guide problems, but do not clearly prove formal exam rules.

Homework-like examsGuide-based examsEasy exams reported
“ .”
PHYS45
“you can study for an hour before the ”
PHY44

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy A, but you won't learn anything.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Lectures consist of him copying solved textbook examples, and he would still frequently get them wrong.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

22/100

“ if you can.”

⚖️

32/100

“He is a and does not have a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are not structured and .
  • Made the .
  • He is absolutely hilarious and not well-understood, but is a great person and doesn't grade hard.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A, but you won't learn anything.
  • not difficult to do well.
  • He will basically mark you down for anything and everything.

Theme 3

📩 About Communication

  • anything
  • and will randomly change due dates without telling the students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across several years give consistent evidence of disorganization and weak .

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 57

Course coverage

PHYS446 reviews
PHYS453 reviews
PHY442 reviews
PHYS101 review
PHYS30A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

4

C+ 3 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1