AI Rate Professor

History

Timothy Greene

HIST18 · HIST17 · HIST1HIST2 · HIST97967 · HIST2 · HIST1 · HIST107180 · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
27.27%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

unless you are comfortable with , and very strict grading.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderEssay HeavyPoor CommunicationGraded By Few ThingsConfusing Directions
  • Many students say grades depend .
  • The strongest negative pattern is harsh, all-or-nothing grading with .
  • A few students found the class manageable, but the overall recommendation tone is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Some students pass or earn A-range grades, but comments show the A and .

Both formats , while online reviews and major essay weights.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The history content may be simple for some, but , and essay expectations make the course feel difficult.

Online students emphasize reading and written work, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

One online review reports mandatory weekly posts or being dropped, and many reviews describe little flexibility in grading.

The ; in-person reviews do not clearly prove an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students warn against taking him because of , and high-stakes papers.

Both formats lean negative, though a small minority in each format found the class manageable or worthwhile.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students repeatedly describe tough grading, full-or-zero rubrics, and .

Format shift

book critiques, finals, and major papers.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload and a few large papers that carry most of the grade.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes, forums, and papers, while and two major papers.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Students often describe him as , and not helpful despite a few positive exceptions.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize poor communication, while and weak guidance.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades are repeatedly described as , and quizzes rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats center on papers, with online reviews giving the clearest breakdown of .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are also mostly negative, with repeated complaints , and poor support.

Main concern

Students report and grades .

What students said

“He grades your entire and .”
HIST2
“PREPARE TO FAIL.”
HIST17
“Easy pass but not beneficial.”
HIST18

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing two high-stakes papers, unclear directions, weak communication, and .

Main concern

Your grade can depend on a small number of .

What students said

“Bases 80% of the grade off of the midterm and final.”
HIST1
“80% of your grade comes from 2 papers.”
HIST17
“Prof hardly communicated (3 posts whole semester).”
HIST1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment risk is high because major papers or essay-style finals carry large grade weight, while proctoring and .

Major PapersUnlimited Quiz AttemptsMidterm And Final MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

38/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and two major papers, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules, proctoring, or open-book status.

Major PapersQuizzesLecture HeavyNo Clear Exam Policy Evidence
“There are also two other assignments that .”
HIST17
“we only had 2 major papers and a .”
HIST18
“ .”
HIST2

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes with unlimited attempts and major papers or a midterm and final, but do not clearly .

Unlimited Quiz AttemptsMajor PapersMidterm And Final MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“quizzes worth 25 points(unlimited retake & highest grade), book critique worth 400 points and a final 5-10 page essay worth 400 points.”
HIST1
“One good thing is that as many times as you wanted.”
HIST2
“Bases 80% of the grade off of the midterm and final.”
HIST1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do yourself a favor and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“He doesn't know how to teach.”

⚖️

12/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Risk

25/100

“80% of your grade comes from 2 papers.”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • He grades your entire and .
  • He grades based on his opinion.
  • If you miss one of the fail.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Assessments

  • There are only a few assignments in this class.
  • The bulk of your grade comes from 2 major essays.
  • You .

Theme 3

📉 About Teaching & Communication

  • He doesn't know how to teach.
  • His syllabus was confusing to understand in .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-three reviews span many years and both formats, with , and assessment structure.

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 56
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 517

Course coverage

HIST211 reviews
HIST179 reviews
HIST16 reviews
HIST184 reviews
HIST1071801 review
Show 2 more courses
HIST1HIST21 review
HIST979671 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 4 · A- 2

B range

11

B+ 3 · B 7 · B- 1

C range

4

C 3 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 4