AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Austin Robles

ETHN1 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you are comfortable with weekly writing and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing gradingWeekly writingClear for someHarsh feedbackReading-heavy
  • Reviews are sharply split between and easy and .
  • Online workload usually centers , and writing.
  • Getting an A depends heavily on writing quality and meeting his expectations, not just completing work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some students earned easy A+ grades, but and an A difficult.

Online evidence is conflicted on grading, while the but deadline-strict class.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The concepts are manageable for many students, but , and essays add friction.

Online reviews range from extremely easy to heavy and frustrating, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews mention participation and weekly work, but they do not clearly prove a .

, while the in-person review only mentions rigid due dates.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendation depends on whether students fit his writing expectations and .

Online reviews are sharply divided, while the but too limited for strong confidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Multiple students call him a students reporting easy A+ outcomes.

Format shift

Strict grading complaints come almost entirely from online reviews, while the .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Work is usually weekly and writing-based, ranging from one , and reflections.

Format shift

Online workload reports conflict sharply, while and essays.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Some students praise clear explanations and guidance, but , and contradictions.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is polarized, while the .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment appears dominated by discussions, critical reflections, essays, video presentations, and weekly assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on reflections, discussions, readings, and presentations, while and essays.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single in-person review says the class is pretty easy but due dates are rigid.

Main concern

Due dates are rigid.

What students said

“Pretty easy class , a few videos and essays .”
ETHN1
“Rigid on due dates but gives adequate time .”
ETHN1

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are highly mixed, with some calling it extremely easy and and unclear.

Main concern

Several students say full credit is difficult and .

What students said

“An A+ is very achievable for this class as long as you put in the effort!”
ETHN1
“ and almost .”
ETHN1
“60-page readings, 2-hour long movies, lengthy lectures, all weekly!”
ETHN1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on writing assignments and do not clearly prove exam format, webcam, proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

No Clear Exam EvidenceWriting AssignmentsCritical ReflectionsDiscussions

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The in-person review mentions videos and essays, but does .

VideosEssays
“Pretty easy class , a few videos and essays .”
ETHN1

Online

Online reviews discuss weekly assignments, reflections, discussions, readings, and presentations, but .

Critical ReflectionsDiscussionsWeekly AssignmentsVideo Presentations
“The and critical reflections.”
ETHN1
“Each week, there is a discussion, lectures (usually 2), Critical Reflection assignments, and Video Presentations due towards the end of the semester.”
ETHN1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and almost .”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting polarized themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

34/100

“ and almost .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Take this class if as he is so good at explaining.”

📚 Workload

48/100

“60-page readings, 2-hour long movies, lengthy lectures, all weekly!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he's straight to the SO much for the assignments.
  • Constant "ums" in .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • An A+ is very achievable for this class as long as you put in the effort!
  • this professor will never give you full credit on an assignment even if you did everything it asked, he grades harshly.
  • Very difficult to get an A. .

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • He assigns 1 assignment each week.
  • The and critical reflections.
  • 60-page readings, 2-hour long movies, lengthy lectures, all weekly!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

87/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve recent reviews provide detailed but polarized evidence, making the disagreement itself credible.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ETHN112 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 4 · A 1 · A- 2

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values