AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Allison Tripp

ANTHRO · ANTHROPOLOGY1 · ANTHRO2 · ANTHRO115197 · ANTHRO1L · ANTH2 · ANTHRO1 · ANTHRO3 · 58 lifetime ratings

AI rating
69/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
69.57%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her if you like anthropology and will keep up with lectures, study guides, and deadlines, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra CreditLecture HeavyTough GraderEngaging When OrganizedAttendance Matters
  • Students often praise her passion, interesting anthropology content, and opportunities.
  • Reviews are polarized because some students find her clear and caring while others .
  • Online reviews are somewhat more favorable for manageable structure, while and lab experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

and study guides make strong grades realistic, but , and deadlines prevent it from being effortless.

Online reviews include more easy A comments and , while in-person reviews are more polarized with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The content is usually accessible for introductory anthropology, but rushed lectures, lab workload, and .

Online sections often feel manageable with lectures and readings, while and lectures show more complaints about pace and clarity.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

38/100

Attendance is often important because reviews mention in-class , and missed work limits.

, while online reviews focus on checking deadlines and posted assignments.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

, and interesting material, but hesitation comes from grading and organization issues.

Online recommendations are slightly steadier, while in-person recommendations range from excellent to strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

54/100

and dropped assignments help, but many students still call her a tough grader or .

Format shift

Online sections mention often, while in-person sections include more complaints about tough grading and .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload is usually manageable but can become heavy in , lectures, and assignments.

Format shift

Online lab reviews report the heaviest busy work, while in-person workload varies from .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

She is often described as passionate, knowledgeable, and engaging, but some students say lectures are rushed, boring, or unclear.

Format shift

Online teaching gets praise for and interesting content, while in-person teaching is more dependent on pace, organization, and course type.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention exams, quizzes, projects, essays, labs, discussions, presentations, and group work, so assessment .

Format shift

Online sections combine quizzes, discussions, readings, projects, and exams, while , and in-class work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are more mixed, with many praising her energy and knowledge but others , and organization.

Main concern

Some in-person students struggle with , and .

What students said

“Her ANTHRO3 in-person and easy to follow”
ANTHRO3
“moves too quickly through the material with no concern for learning retention.”
ANTHRO1L
“The grade is not going to be handed to you easily though, you need to work for it.”
ANTHRO1

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive about interesting content, , and manageable work, but some students report harsh grading and .

Main concern

Online students must keep up with , and deadlines because late or missed work can hurt badly.

What students said

“She makes lectures simple and easy to follow.”
ANTHRO1
“This was a 1-unit lab and was so much work.”
ANTHRO1L
“Tons of .”
ANTHRO2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews support quizzes, exams, study guides, and , but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or .

QuizzesThree ExamsFinal ExamStudy GuidesExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

based on readings, and presentations, but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring rules.

Three ExamsFinal ExamStudy GuidesPresentationsIn-Class Activities
“There are 3 exams including the .”
ANTHRO1
“She gives the opportunity to earn up to 20 points of .”
ANTHRO1
“ ,and a debate.”
ANTHRO2

Online

, and a , but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

QuizzesMidtermFinalReading-Based Tests
“Watch lectures, read article for , and the honors project.”
ANTHRO3
“ .”
ANTHRO1
“ and a chapter or two of ”
ANTHRO2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Tripp is one of the so far.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“She makes lectures simple and easy to follow.”

⚖️

54/100

“The grade is not going to be handed to you easily though, you need to work for it.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

70/100

“Eye-opening class beyond being easy and would definitely recommend for anybody to take an anthropology class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very knowledgeable with lots of energy.
  • Her class is fun, and high energy.
  • She makes lectures simple and easy to follow.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Grades

  • Lot's of quizzes and written assignments.
  • This was a 1-unit lab and was so much work.
  • Tons of .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Clarity & Pace

  • moves too quickly through the material with no concern for learning retention.
  • she needs to because it was hard for me to follow.
  • She is a

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

58

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews over many years give detailed but , and format differences.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 533
4 out of 58
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ANTHRO125 reviews
ANTHRO1L9 reviews
ANTHRO36 reviews
ANTHRO24 reviews
ANTHRO3 reviews
Show 3 more courses
ANTH21 review
ANTHRO1151971 review
ANTHROPOLOGY11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 9 · A 6 · A- 3

B range

13

B+ 7 · B 4 · B- 2

C range

8

C+ 2 · C 6

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1