AI Rate Professor

Communication Studies

Robert Montgomery

COMSTD2 · COMSTD8 · COMSTD4 · COMSTD6 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid him online unless , and can tolerate strict grading.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderUnclear instructionsSpeech heavyStrict deadlinesMixed support
  • Online reviews are mostly negative and , and outdated materials.
  • Some students say he is caring and helpful, but that support and clarity complaints.
  • students finding the class easy or supportive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students earn A grades, but many comments , and picky grading make the A costly.

Online evidence is much harsher, while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

The communication content may not be inherently hard, but , and strict grading make the course feel challenging.

Online and demanding than the mixed in-person sections.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

, and no-late-submission policies as important parts of the class.

and no late submissions, while online evidence emphasizes strict submission and assignment rules.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

The dominant recommendation signal is negative because students complain , and frustrating online organization.

Online reviews drive the , while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Many students call him picky or tough and say small requirement .

Format shift

Online reviews show the strictest grading complaints, while and strict deadlines.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Workload often includes speeches, detailed outlines, readings, papers, participation, quizzes, and group projects.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize papers, readings, and speech recordings, while , and group projects.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

He is sometimes described as caring or kind, but and poor organization lower the teaching experience.

Format shift

, while and somewhat warmer.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

Assessment appears driven , and group projects rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats focus on assignments and speeches, with and attendance.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, ranging from welcoming and , and deadline-focused.

Main concern

Strict deadlines, detailed outlines, and .

What students said

“he made class really easy and fun.”
COMSTD4
“Lots of homework and if it is not to his standars he will ask you to redo it.”
COMSTD2

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are weak overall, with repeated complaints , and heavy speech requirements.

Main concern

because instructions and speech criteria are strict or confusing.

What students said

“ .”
COMSTD2
“ , and his example PDFs are a bit outdated.”
COMSTD2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus more on speeches, projects, and , and they do not clearly prove webcam use, Lockdown Browser, open-book format, or proctoring rules.

SpeechesQuizzesGroup ProjectFinal Assignment

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention , and a strict final assignment deadline, but do not clearly prove exam format or proctoring rules.

Class QuizzesFinal AssignmentGroup Project
“The and group project.”
COMSTD8
“when it came to the deadline”
COMSTD8

Online

Online reviews mention speech recordings and assignment criteria but do not clearly prove webcam proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, midterm format, or .

Recorded SpeechesAssignment Criteria
“Your speeches will make or break your grade.”
COMSTD2
“extremely specific criteria difficult to accomplish for recording speeches.”
COMSTD2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“TAKE ANOTHER PROFESSOR IF YOU CAN!”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“ .”

⚖️

24/100

“he always found something to not give the full credit.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

32/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • A kind person.
  • He listens and .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Your speeches will make or break your grade.
  • It should be an easy A as long as you follow instructions.
  • He is very strict professor and so rude while grading

Theme 3

🧾 About Workload and Instructions

  • , and his example PDFs are a bit outdated.
  • Lots of homework and if it is not to his standars he will ask you to redo it.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 15 reviews with a and enough format-specific evidence to separate experiences.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

COMSTD210 reviews
COMSTD62 reviews
COMSTD82 reviews
COMSTD41 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 6 · A- 1

B range

3

B 1 · B- 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1