AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Zekeriya Aliyazicioglu

ENGIN71 · ENGIN30 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you can teach yourself and tolerate strict, unpredictable course management.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh GradingDisorganized TeachingSelf-Teaching RequiredStrict DeadlinesTest Heavy
  • Most students , and heavy self-teaching.
  • , and attendance penalties create high risk.
  • Some students still earned A grades, but many say the experience was stressful and poorly run.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Several students earned A grades, but , and .

poor structure, while the single online review suggests a much harder path.

Is the course easy?

Standard

47/100

The material may not always be conceptually hard, but .

In-person reviews often call the class manageable but poorly run, while the online review describes the work as extremely difficult.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

8/100

Reviews describe locked assignments, attendance penalties, random in-class work, and no makeups.

In-person evidence strongly shows strict attendance consequences, while the online review .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students warn against taking him because of , and .

Both formats are negative, but the online evidence is based on only one severe review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students repeatedly mention tough grading, no late work, penalties, and .

Format shift

, while the online review also describes GPA risk.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and lab demands are described as frequent, stressful, or hard to complete.

Format shift

The online review calls homework impossible, while and random short deadlines.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Students often say he is , disorganized, unclear, and unsupportive when asked questions.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide repeated evidence, and the lone online review is also strongly negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Reviews mention homework, projects, quizzes, exams, and a final, so and tests.

Format shift

, and a final, while the online review only clearly mentions homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews mostly criticize unclear , and .

Main concern

Students while managing strict penalties.

What students said

“You will spend the whole course teaching yourself because the professor is incapable of doing so.”
Engin-71
“Doesn't accept late work.”
engin-30
“ ”
engin-30

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is extremely negative and and severe stress.

Main concern

The workload and teaching experience were described as overwhelming.

What students said

“this was the .”
engin-30
“ .”
engin-30

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show quizzes, tests, and a final, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring.

Test HeavyQuizzes MentionedFinal MentionedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring.

Test HeavyPop QuizzesFinal Mentioned
“2 exams and a final.”
Engin-71
“You get projects and days.”
engin-30

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you genuinely want to learn c++.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course rules. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“ ”

⚖️

15/100

“He's always looking for ways to ruin someone's grade.”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and .

Theme 2

⚖️

  • Doesn't accept late work.
  • changed the

Theme 3

📈

  • You get projects and days.
  • 2 exams and a final.
  • many of his tests and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews give consistent concerns about teaching and grading, but and only one online review exists.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

engin-307 reviews
Engin-711 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1