AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Robin Witt

MATH · NA · MATH520 · MATH425 · MATH65A · MATH25 · MATH420 · MATH65B · MATH60 · MATH41097351 · MATH31 · MATH410 · MATH61 · 90 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
21.95%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless you are already strong in math and can learn independently from books, tutoring, or videos.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-taught mathFast paceHeavy homeworkTest heavyPolarizing teaching
  • Most recent reviews describe the class as , and .
  • Workload is heavy, with , and reading.
  • A smaller group of students praise her energy, help, , and fair tests when students already have math strength.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A usually requires strong prior math skills, heavy homework, tutoring, and .

Online has one easy-A comment, but both online and and self-teaching.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The math content feels harder because students report fast pacing, confusing explanations, and reliance on outside resources.

Both formats describe the course as difficult, with and more detailed evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

Attendance appears important because students mention participation, group work, and not passing if , but .

In-person reviews mention participation and group work more often, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Most students do not recommend her because , and forced to teach themselves.

Online reviews are mixed with one positive outlier, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

Many students call her a tough grader, though some older positive reviews mention fair tests, , or .

Format shift

Online reviews include tough grading complaints, while and grade damage.

Workload

Heavy

18/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and fast pacing.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy work, with , readings, and group assignments.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

A minority praise her personality and help, but most comments say , and often leaves students to self-teach.

Format shift

Online reviews are limited and mixed, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Students repeatedly , and some group work, with exams carrying major pressure.

Format shift

Both formats mention test-heavy assessment, but and classroom participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

recent years, citing self-teaching, fast pacing, and harsh workload.

Main concern

Many students say and the class becomes self-taught.

What students said

“The . This class was completely 100% self taught.”
MATH65A
“Everything was confusing as ever and .”
MATH31
“Don't expect to skate through this class and get an A, you will have to put in the work.”
MATH60

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed but lean negative, with , and self-teaching concerns.

Main concern

Students often had to teach themselves and keep up with heavy work.

What students said

“She doesn't really teach you anything, she just give you a the book and you have to learn everything yourself.”
MATH31
“LOTS OF HOMEWORK!!!!!!!!! taking this”
MATH31
“Pretty easy just don't fall behind.”
MATH65A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and quizzes, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring policy.

Test HeavyFrequent QuizzesPop QuizzesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and pop quizzes, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or .

Test HeavyPop QuizzesFrequent Quizzes
“ : its literally every day)”
MATH
“Tests are 80% of your grade.”
MATH520
“There alot of ”
MATH65A

Online

Online reviews mention tests as heavy, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policy.

Test HeavyNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ taking this”
MATH31
“LOTS OF HOMEWORK!!!!!!!!! taking this”
MATH31

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The . This class was completely 100% self taught.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Everything was confusing as ever and .”

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“There alot of ”

👍 Recommendation Risk

24/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she barely teaches, just lets the TA do everything.
  • Whole class is self taught, professor sucks at teaching.
  • She is joyful and lighthearted.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Don't expect to skate through this class and get an A, you will have to put in the work.
  • and offers no .
  • and gives you as as possible.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK!!!!!!!!! taking this
  • Textbook cost around 200-250, you have to read it everyday.
  • There was homework assigned for every section for the chapter but it was due on a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

90

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years give strong credibility, especially because recent reviews repeat the same concerns about pacing, workload, and self-teaching.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 534
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 514
1 out of 535

Course coverage

MATH3116 reviews
MATH65A7 reviews
MATH5205 reviews
MATH254 reviews
MATH3 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MATH603 reviews
312 reviews
MATH4102 reviews
MATH4202 reviews
MATH65B2 reviews
MATH410973511 review
MATH4251 review
MATH611 review
NA1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

37 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 5

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 4

C range

9

C+ 3 · C 6

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

13

Drop/Withdrawal 7 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 2