AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Youssef Daoudi

CHEM24A · PHSCI10 · CHEM10 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
52.38%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

if you want a demanding chemistry class and can keep up with lectures, practice, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerEngaging chemistry lecturesTough examsHeavy workloadStrict gradingParticipation matters
  • Students are split between calling him an excellent explainer and warning that the class is stressful and strict.
  • Chemistry content is demanding, with , and .
  • Success is possible for students who attend, practice consistently, and ask questions early.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

A good grade is possible, but students repeatedly , and major study effort.

In-person evidence dominates and shows hard-earned grades, while the single online review is too limited and negative to support an easy A.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Chemistry concepts are challenging and students often say the class is hard to keep up with without practice and attendance.

In-person reviews provide almost all course difficulty evidence, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

32/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly tied to success, even when a .

, while the online review has a tag saying skipping class hurts performance.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

53/100

, but not for students needing flexibility or a low-stress class.

In-person recommendations are split, while the only online review is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Many students call him a and warn that exams and .

Format shift

online review also negative.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and work-heavy chemistry sections.

Format shift

, while the online review also reports lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

, but reviews also describe poor flexibility, intimidation, and weak responsiveness.

Format shift

, while the single online review is negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Students frequently mention exams, study guides, a , and labs.

Format shift

, while online exam details are not clearly stated.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly mixed, with strong praise for lectures and humor but , and stress.

Main concern

Students must attend, study hard, and handle a .

What students said

“Study hard for .”
CHEM-10
“He is ready to fail you so you need to put in the extra time and effort”
CHEM-10
“His lectures are very easy to understand and he makes sure to help when needed.”
CHEM-10

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is strongly negative and describes the instructor as inflexible, rude, and difficult to approach.

Main concern

There is too little online evidence, but the one review reports poor support and strictness.

What students said

“this guy is ridiculous.”
CHEM24A
“very rude to classmates, and seems annoyed when asked questions regarding the material.”
CHEM24A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students , and a long cumulative final, but proctoring rules are not clearly proven.

Tough ExamsCumulative FinalPop QuizzesStudy GuidesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a long cumulative final, but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring rules.

Tough ExamsCumulative FinalPop QuizzesStudy Guides
“17 page accumaltive final,,, that's all i got to say”
CHEM-10
“Study hard for .”
CHEM-10
“Beware of pop quizzes”
CHEM24A

Online

The single online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Study hard for .”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“He makes the lectures easy to understand and .”

🧪 Course Difficulty

34/100

“The whole time I was stressed for my life and that affected my overall health.”

📝

30/100

“17 page accumaltive final,,, that's all i got to say”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He teaches with lots of mnemonics that make it easy to remember and understand.
  • His lectures had stories that helped with memorization, humor that kept us engaged during dry content, and lots of PRACTICE.
  • He makes the material way more complicated than it needs to be.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He is ready to fail you so you need to put in the extra time and effort
  • Study hard for .
  • very work heavy and participation matters

Theme 3

💬 About Support & Flexibility

  • will answer your questions f your lost and will help you understand.
  • Very bad at responding.
  • he doesnt help sufficiently and acts if you were dumb.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

89/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 21 reviews with detailed comments across several years and a and workload complaints.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 57

Course coverage

CHEM-1016 reviews
CHEM24A4 reviews
PHSCI101 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 2 · C- 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1