AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Alan Aquallo

ETHN2 · ETHN1 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
13/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

unless you can tolerate an , and writing-intensive course.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerOverwhelming workloadDisorganized courseUnclear instructionsMany papersAvoid if possible
  • All ratings are extremely negative, with students repeatedly .
  • Online reviews describe daily assignments, multiple , and little flexibility.
  • Students acknowledge subject knowledge occasionally, but the teaching experience is dominated by disorganization, confusion, and excessive workload.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Some students earned As, but comments show the , and surviving unclear expectations.

Almost all evidence comes from online reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Students , and not like intro classes because materials and instructions are .

Online reviews provide the strong evidence of , while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

5/100

Online students report daily participation expectations, no late work, and little flexibility.

Online evidence shows strict daily participation and deadlines, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

0/100

because the workload is extreme, organization is poor, and .

The reviews, with no positive in-person counterweight.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students report tough grading, low grades on well-written work, no late work, and .

Format shift

Online reviews provide detailed harsh-grading evidence, while the .

Workload

Overwhelming

0/100

Reviews repeatedly describe daily videos, daily discussions, multiple weekly essays, large midterms, a 15-page final paper, and major projects.

Format shift

Online workload evidence is overwhelming and consistent, while the .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students describe the course as , and extremely difficult to navigate despite his subject knowledge.

Format shift

Online reviews consistently describe awful organization and communication, while the .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment is dominated by discussions, daily , and projects, with exams mentioned as essay-heavy.

Format shift

Online reviews show assignment-heavy assessment, while the .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The and negative, mentioning fine work but assigning the lowest quality rating and high difficulty.

Main concern

There is , but the one and heavy writing tags.

What students said

“The work was fine in general.”
ETHN-1

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are overwhelmingly negative, describing excessive daily work, unclear instructions, strict deadlines, and poor organization.

Main concern

The workload is repeatedly described as extreme for an introductory or fast-track course.

What students said

“ IF POSSIBLE, ESPECIALLY 8 WEEK COURSE.”
ETHN-1
“ .”
ETHN-2
“it feels like a treasure hunt to locate materials needed for the course.”
ETHN-2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and finals within a heavy writing workload, with no clear proof of proctoring or open-book rules.

Essay MidtermEssay FinalDaily WritingNo Clear Proctoring EvidenceNo Clear Open-Book Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format, proctoring, open-book rules, or final format.

Online

Online reviews mention multi-essay midterms and finals, but do not clearly .

Essay MidtermEssay FinalFinal Exam Split Into SectionsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Midterm (3) 500 words essays, 15 page paper final, + (3) 500 word essays final.”
ETHN-1
“ , and a huge research project.”
ETHN-1
“a pages per section”
ETHN-2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ IF POSSIBLE, ESPECIALLY 8 WEEK COURSE.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting consistent , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“ ! .”

📚 Workload Pressure

0/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

0/100

“ !”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Insane amount of work of an 8 week course.
  • Two full page essays due each week along with ...
  • A 15-page essay, 10-minute presentation, and 20-slide PowerPoint are due at the end of class.
  • There was an overload of work.

Theme 2

🧭 About Organization

  • Horrible at giving directions and .
  • the and all over the place.
  • it is like a treasure hunt to gather all the required materials/instructions.
  • Classwork is difficult to find.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Warnings

  • !
  • Avoid.
  • .
  • Horrible

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The review count is modest but highly consistent, recent, and detailed, especially for online sections.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 513

Course coverage

ETHN-27 reviews
ETHN-16 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 4