AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Sandra Hall

DRAFT53 · ENE42 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
77.78%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take Hall if you are motivated and willing to ask for help, but avoid her if you.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful with drafting toolsStrong industry experienceClear feedbackMixed grading fairnessSelf-teaching risk
  • Most online , and , but one recent online review reports very harsh grading.
  • experience and a discouraging classroom experience.
  • The course can reward hard workers with high grades, but expectations and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

High grades are common for hard-working students, but and credit loss even when instructions are followed.

Online evidence includes both easy A praise and , while in-person evidence is too .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Drafting content is often described as fairly easy with provided resources, but added design projects and .

Online reviews mostly describe manageable work with support, while self-teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

because an in-person student says being a few minutes late can be called out publicly.

The , and online reviews do not clearly prove attendance rules.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

77/100

, and feedback-oriented, but recent negative experiences prevent a must-take rating.

Online reviews are mostly recommend-heavy with one strong warning, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grades can be fair or generous for students who work hard, but there are credible complaints about very tough and .

Format shift

Online reviews contain both fair grading praise and the harshest grading complaint, while .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Assignments and projects are usually manageable, but students mention lots of homework and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention reasonable work but also lots of homework, while .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most students describe Hall as helpful, experienced, and caring, but and self-teaching.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is mostly strong, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and some exams, so assessment appears mixed rather than exam-only.

Format shift

Online comments mention , and exams, while in-person comments do not clearly define the assessment mix.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews conflict sharply, with one student praising her instruction and another describing a discouraging classroom environment.

Main concern

A recent in-person review reports public callouts, dismissive responses, and heavy self-teaching.

What students said

“Professor Hall is amazing and is a great instructor.”
ENE42
“Expect a lot of self teaching.”
Draft53

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly very positive, emphasizing help, feedback, and .

Main concern

One online and .

What students said

“she provides you with EVRYTHING you need to complete the assignments and projects.”
Draft53
“she is the ”
ENE42
“If you are a hard work and love what you study, you will get an easy A+”
ENE42

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention exams and strictness but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or closed-book policies.

Exams mentionedPolicy unclearStrictness complaint

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

Online

Online reviews mention exams and one student says passing them is very hard, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Exams mentionedPolicy unclearStrictness complaint
“U have to be genius to pass, same as exams.”
ENE42

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are a hard work and love what you study, you will get an easy A+”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ and pretty much willing to help on big or small issues with Revit.”

⚖️

58/100

“she is the ”

👍 Recommendation Rate

77/100

“Going to take her again for Draft 51 and 53!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Sandra Hall is very smart and professional.
  • Professor Hall is amazing and is a great instructor.
  • Expect a lot of self teaching.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Work

  • Last semester I took DRAFT 50 with her and I got an easy A+
  • I learned a lot from this class and the amount of .
  • If you are a hard work and love what you study, you will get an easy A+

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • she really cares about every student
  • , and never gets bored.
  • Asking questions is not encouraged, and responses can feel dismissive.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across multiple years give useful evidence, but recent negative reviews conflict with a cluster of older positive ones.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENE426 reviews
Draft533 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 3 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1