AI Rate Professor

Finance

Marion Bly

ACCTG30 · ACCTGFS30 · ACCTGFS10593 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
53/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
53.85%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can work independently and tolerate inconsistent communication.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-taught coursePoor email responseHeavy readingCengage dependentCaring but inconsistent
  • Online reviews are sharply and serious complaints about no teaching or email response.
  • and flexibility but still mention disorganization and confusion.
  • Grades can be good, but students often , and assignments.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is reachable because many students earned strong grades, but , and self-teaching.

Online evidence is split between easy completion and hard self-teaching, while but less grade-specific.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The content itself is manageable, but , and reading load make it feel harder than expected.

and Cengage, while in-person reviews emphasize disorganization and confusing class flow.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

65/100

Reviews do , and several comments describe flexibility with assignments.

Online evidence focuses on deadlines and assignments, while in-person evidence mentions flexibility without a .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

54/100

and flexible, but recent negative reviews warn about absent teaching and .

Online recommendations are highly polarized, while but still mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grades can be strong, but tough-grader complaints and lenient.

Format shift

Online grading varies from easy completion to harsh project confusion, while as flexible but not deeply documented.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Many reviews mention heavy reading, weekly quizzes, homework, projects, or time-consuming Cengage work.

Format shift

Online workload is clearly reading and , while but still present.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Bly is sometimes caring and effective, but repeated complaints about no teaching, poor organization, and unanswered emails sharply reduce confidence.

Format shift

Online reviews are more negative in recent years, while and lectures.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews , and a portfolio project more than exams.

Format shift

Online assessment appears assignment-heavy, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and flexible teacher, but organization and communication are inconsistent.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“She doesn't teach anything.”
ACCTGFS30
“ and confusing.”
ACCTG30
“She actually listens and CARES about the student.”
ACCTGFS10593

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online , and grade-accessible, but recent reviews complain about and poor communication.

Main concern

Students may need to teach themselves with little instructor support.

What students said

“she didn't do anything. Very "hands-off" type of professor.”
ACCTGFS30
“ .”
ACCTGFS30
“ .”
ACCTGFS30

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The clearest exam evidence says one and used a portfolio project, but most reviews do not clearly prove the .

No Final ExamPortfolio ProjectWeekly Quizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

76/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, open-book rules, midterm format, or .

Online

Online reviews clearly mention weekly quizzes and one course with , but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

No Final ExamPortfolio ProjectWeekly Quizzes
“ .”
ACCTGFS30
“weekly tests”
ACCTGFS30

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to learn, get a better prof.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, communication, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“This "professor" didn't even teach any bit of the course.”

⚖️ Grade Value

62/100

“It's so easy, you literally can't fail.”

📚 Workload

32/100

“20 pages of ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very "hands-off" type of professor.
  • She doesn't teach anything.
  • She communicates very effectively by posting a video every week checking in.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's so easy, you literally can't fail.
  • you need to do all of your work and work for your grade.
  • Hardest class ever stressed all the time shocked I passed.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • .
  • .
  • She actually listens and CARES about the student.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across online and , though opinions are polarized across years.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ACCTGFS3010 reviews
ACCTGFS105932 reviews
ACCTG301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1