AI Rate Professor

Guidance

Kymberly Hirst

GUID507 · GUD507 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
68.75%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want a personal, reflective guidance class and can keep up with participation and assignments.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and personalParticipation-heavyInspirational lecturesMixed communicationReflective assignments
  • Most in-person students describe her as caring, funny, and meaningful when students attend and participate.
  • Grades are usually manageable, but success depends on showing up, doing reflective work, and being open.
  • The only online review , and slow replies.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

A good grade is realistic, but , and reflective assignments rather than just minimal effort.

, while the one online review describes the work as confusing and hard to finish.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The content is mostly personal reflection and self-awareness, but workload and participation can make it stressful.

In-person students often call the work not hard, while the online review says the .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and participation are required to pass.

; the online review does not provide attendance evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

and meaningful teaching, but communication and online organization are real risks.

, while the only online review is negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Grades are generally attainable when students participate and complete personal work, but .

Format shift

, while the online review says the .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The work is usually described as easy but frequent, with several students mentioning lots of .

Format shift

but manageable tasks, while the online review reports many nested assignments.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most students praise her caring, humor, and impact, though a minority report poor communication and unfairness.

Format shift

, while the single online review is sharply negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews point to assignments, papers, participation, success center visits, and reflective work rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats mainly mention assignments, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

teaching and meaningful lectures, but attendance and participation matter a lot.

Main concern

Mandatory participation and uneven communication in older reviews.

What students said

“she really cares about her students.”
GUD507
“If you show up participate and do the .”
GUID507
“You have to attend all classes and MUST GO TO SUCCESS CENTER VISITS!”
GUID507

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is negative and says the , and communication were .

Main concern

and slow communication.

What students said

“Her online so .”
GUID507
“Also hard to communicate with as while.”
GUID507

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the final structure.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Online

The online review does .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you show up participate and do the . End of discussion.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, participation, workload, and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“she really cares about her students.”

📈 Effort and Grades

70/100

“If you show up participate and do the .”

⚠️ Online Risk

35/100

“Her online so .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Kymberly is an outstanding teacher in my own opinion, great lecture, she really cares about you and your opinion.
  • Kymberly is an amazing human she's fun and hilarious!
  • This professor is a must.. She knocks reality in to you and seriously makes you look at life differently.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload and Grades

  • theres a lot of work but its not hard.
  • If you miss class alot and dont do the work or just bs it youll fail.
  • You have to attend all classes and MUST GO TO SUCCESS CENTER VISITS!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • does not know how to respond to emails, so if you have any questions or concerns about a .
  • Her online so .
  • The class was a total waste of time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews across , though online evidence is limited to one review.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

GUID50713 reviews
GUD5073 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 3 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1