AI Rate Professor

Business

Denise Thompson

BUSMGT480 · BUSMGT440 · BUSMK40 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if possible, but be cautious online unless and strict formatting rules.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful but inconsistentTextbook focusedTough online gradingRelevant study guides
  • and and engaging real-world examples.
  • Online reviews are mixed, with , and unclear communication.
  • Getting an A is possible, but online students may need to complete , attend Zoom meetings, and read heavily.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

A grades appear possible, but online comments say , and can be required to protect the grade.

Online evidence shows more grade friction, while study guides.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The content itself seems manageable business material, but heavy textbook reliance and .

In-person reviews call the class not hard, while online reviews , and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Some online sections require Zoom attendance or an alternative summary, while other evidence does .

Online reviews explicitly mention Zoom participation affecting grades, while in-person .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

and organized, but online disorganization and harsh grading make the choice risky.

, while online reviews are split between strong praise and serious warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Online reviews repeatedly mention harsh grading, APA penalties, and .

Format shift

Strict grading complaints are mainly online, while .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload is not consistently extreme, but , and online participation add effort.

Format shift

Online work feels heavier due to platform issues and participation demands, while and more predictable.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

She is described as caring and knowledgeable, but online students report poor communication and .

Format shift

In-person teaching is viewed as stronger and calmer, while online teaching has the main consistency problems.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention , and participation rather than one dominant assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews mention assignments and short-essay quizzes, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, knowledgeable teacher whose study guides match the tests.

Main concern

.

What students said

“she gives study guides which are exactly what you're tested on.”
BUSMGT440
“one of the ”
BUSMGT480
“She's VERRRRRY textbook orriented and the classes are extremely dry...”
BUSMK40

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online experiences vary sharply, with some students praising help and while , and required Zoom participation.

Main concern

Online students report inconsistent communication, locked assignments, and .

What students said

“No communication or consistency.”
BUSMK40
“Grades very harshly.”
BUSMK40
“Students could work ahead in her class and the if a student did work ahead.”
BUSMGT440

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited, with study guides helping tests in person and short essay quizzes mentioned online, but .

Study Guides Match TestsShort Essay QuizzesReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests follow the text, but do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book rules.

Study Guides Match TestsText-Based TestsNo Clear Exam Policy Evidence
“she gives study guides which are exactly what you're tested on.”
BUSMGT440
“The good.”
BUSMK40

Online

Online reviews mention short essay quizzes and relevant study guides, but do not clearly .

Short Essay QuizzesRelevant Study GuidesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ .”
BUSMGT480
“Her study guides are very relevant to the tests”
BUSMK40

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“No communication or consistency.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

60/100

“she gives study guides which are exactly what you're tested on.”

⚖️

35/100

“Grades very harshly.”

👍 Recommendation Split

58/100

“Overall she is the !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she really wants you to gain knowledge and experience from this class.
  • Her class is so interesting and made learning about business fun.
  • She's VERRRRRY textbook orriented and the classes are extremely dry...

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , and you will get reduced points for not having it this format perfectly.
  • Students could work ahead in her class and the if a student did work ahead.
  • not a hard class

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • Assignments kept being locked and after several email .
  • claims to be asynchronous, but .
  • Never had a zoom meeting.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews across a long time span give useful format contrast, but the and the online evidence is mixed.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

BUSMK404 reviews
BUSMGT4402 reviews
BUSMGT4802 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1