AI Rate Professor

Communication Studies

Carrie Veazey

COMSTD8 · COMM6 · COMST2 · COMSTD216419 · COM74 · COMSTD2 · CMSTD2 · CMSTD8 · 102 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
50.7%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Only take her if , and detailed rubrics without needing fast or flexible support.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderHeavy workloadVague instructionsStrong feedback when engagedPolarizing teacher
  • Reviews are highly polarized, with and clarity while many others call her vague, slow, and overly strict.
  • The course is not an easy A because speeches, writing, presentations, rubrics, and students.
  • Online reviews are especially risky in , and poor communication.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

A grades are possible, but students repeatedly , and minor point deductions.

Online and in-person evidence both show high effort, with online complaints focused on confusing modules and and vague instructions.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Communication concepts may be manageable, but , and unclear directions make the course feel challenging.

Online sections feel harder because of module confusion and asynchronous workload, while because speeches and rubrics come quickly.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Several reviews say participation, attendance, audience requirements, and skipped classes affect success.

Online evidence includes required speech audiences and presentation work, while ? You won't pass tags.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

and structure, but many others strongly warn against vague instructions and harsh grading.

Both formats are polarized, though recent online reviews skew more negative and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

Many students call her a and does not accept late work.

Format shift

Strict grading is reported in both formats, with online students highlighting rubric and upload issues and .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and fast-track deadlines.

Format shift

Online workload is described as confusing and assignment-heavy, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Positive reviews praise feedback and organization, but the volume of complaints , and poor communication lowers the overall experience.

Format shift

Online teaching has more recent severe communication complaints, while and vague instruction.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment appears driven mostly , and projects rather than exams alone.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize discussion boards, recorded speeches, quizzes, and papers, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are also polarized, with and inspiration or criticizing vague teaching and .

Main concern

vague, and attendance or participation is important.

What students said

“Mrs. Veazey was tough but fair.”
COMSTD8
“Her instructions are vague and elusive”
CMSTD2
“Love this instructor! You can tell she is passionate about teaching and that makes the class enjoyable.”
CMSTD8

Remote format

Online

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are sharply mixed but recent complaints , and strict standards.

Main concern

Online students repeatedly report unclear instructions, heavy weekly work, and delayed or limited communication.

What students said

“ about 5 minimum very confusing modules and does not explain anything clearly”
CMSTD2
“ , and her only response was to “look it up.””
CMSTD8
“Professor Veazey runs a well-organized class, with and .”
CMSTD2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is presentation and writing heavy, with some quizzes and exams mentioned, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

Presentation HeavySpeech RecordingsQuizzes MentionedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

PresentationsExams MentionedPapersFinal Mentioned
“the in-class time was for presentations and exams.”
CMSTD8
“She requires the text book to help with .”
COMSTD2

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, recorded presentations, and audience requirements, but do not clearly .

Recorded PresentationsAudience RequirementQuizzes MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“There are 4 presentations you need to prepare and record.”
CMSTD2
“ ”
CMSTD8
“I was required to have people in the room with me.”
CMSTD2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very vague, tough grader and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

⚖️

22/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“ about 5 minimum very confusing modules and does not explain anything clearly”

🎯 Teaching Split

42/100

“Professor Veazey runs a well-organized class, with and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her instructions are vague and elusive
  • She was very clear about what she wanted in the speeches and handed out the .
  • Love this instructor! You can tell she is passionate about teaching and that makes the class enjoyable.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • Not an easy A. But such a great teacher.
  • if it wasn't because of the that was offered towards the end I would of received a "B".

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Be prepared to write A LOT
  • This professor meticulously grades the smallest details, assigns a lot of assignments, and rarely gets back to you when you need her to.
  • I took ComSt2 as a fast track course and it was a lot of work.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

102

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across online and in-person formats provide detailed, consistent themes despite strong polarization.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 557
4 out of 510
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 529

Course coverage

CMSTD224 reviews
CMSTD815 reviews
COMSTD23 reviews
COMM62 reviews
COMST22 reviews
Show 3 more courses
COMSTD82 reviews
COM741 review
COMSTD2164191 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 6 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

14

B+ 6 · B 5 · B- 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3