AI Rate Professor

Science

Nik Pheng

EMT405 · FIRETEC9 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you value knowledgeable support, but be cautious with online or hybrid sections based on the reported quiz and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerKnowledgeableSupportive in personHelpful explanationsOnline quiz issuesFormat-dependent
  • and describe him as knowledgeable, supportive, and helpful.
  • The single online FIRETEC review and missed early meetings.
  • The overall recommendation is mixed because the experience differs strongly by format.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

A grades are possible, but comments suggest moderate difficulty and the online .

, while the online review reports quiz and test problems.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The course seems moderately challenging because students learned a lot and ratings show average difficulty, while .

explanations, while online evidence suggests added difficulty from assessment issues.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though one online-hybrid review reports missed early meetings by the instructor.

Neither format clearly .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

, but the online review is negative enough to reduce the overall recommendation.

, while the only online review is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Grades are good in the small sample, but the online review reports disputed quiz and .

Format shift

, while online grading fairness is questioned.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews do not describe a heavy workload, but moderate difficulty and .

Format shift

In-person workload is not criticized, while and .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

In-person teaching is praised as knowledgeable and supportive, but the online review reports serious reliability and assessment problems.

Format shift

In-person teaching evidence is strong, while online evidence is poor and format-specific.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

The clearest assessment evidence mentions quizzes and .

Format shift

Online evidence explicitly mentions quizzes and tests, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a and supports students.

Main concern

The main concern is moderate course difficulty rather than teaching quality.

What students said

“Great instructor. Learned a lot.”
emt-405
“Takes the and stay after class to clarify any questions or topics.”
emt-405
“ and caring throughout the semester.”
emt-405

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review reports flawed quizzes and , and missed early class meetings.

Main concern

The main concern is unreliable online assessment quality and missed class presence.

What students said

“He changes the quizzes and but his personal opinion is correct.”
FIRETEC-9
“he didn't show up the first 3 weeks”
FIRETEC-9

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and tests with disputed answers, while reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

QuizzesTestsAssessment Accuracy Concerns

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Online

, and lecture, but does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

QuizzesTestsAssessment Accuracy Concerns
“a lot of the but only one is correct”
FIRETEC-9
“ , and lecture on Thursdays”
FIRETEC-9

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great instructor. Learned a lot. Very knowledgeable of the subject and life experiences.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Takes the and stay after class to clarify any questions or topics.”

👍 Recommendation Split

68/100

“ .”

⚠️ Online Assessment Risk

35/100

“a lot of the but only one is correct”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫

  • Great instructor. Learned a lot.
  • Very knowledgeable of the subject and life experiences.
  • and caring throughout the semester.

Theme 2

🧪 About Online Assessments

  • He changes the quizzes and but his personal opinion is correct.
  • , and lecture on Thursdays
  • he didn't show up the first 3 weeks

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is based on only three reviews with a sharp split between one negative online review and .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

emt-4052 reviews
FIRETEC-91 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values