AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Logan Shawntel

NURADN403 · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
87.1%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Take Logan Shawntel if you want a and can keep up with writing-based assignments.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear online structureHelpful feedbackExtra creditHeavy writingAccessible by email
  • Online students , and .
  • The course is usually manageable for strong grades, but writing-heavy case studies and .
  • A few older and , so assignment instructions are the main risk.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

High grades are common and helps, but students still need to complete writing-heavy discussions, case studies, and online modules.

Online evidence supports an easier path to an A, while and more mixed.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The content is understandable with videos and , but pathophysiology concepts and case studies still require steady attention.

Online reviews describe clearer pacing and self-paced learning, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

72/100

Recorded lectures and online pacing create flexibility, though some live Zoom meetings and required posts still matter.

Online students mention recorded lectures and self-paced modules, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

89/100

Most students recommend her because , and gives useful feedback that helps them succeed.

Online reviews are overwhelmingly recommended, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

and many A grades suggest lenient outcomes, though some reviews still call her a .

Format shift

Online grading looks more forgiving, while .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload is manageable but , and writing requirements.

Format shift

Online reviews repeatedly mention homework and papers, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Students repeatedly , and willingness to help.

Format shift

Online teaching is rated very strongly, while and mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews focus mostly , and online activities rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats point toward assignment-heavy assessment, with online reviews providing most of the evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person evidence is mixed, with one strong praise review and .

Main concern

In-person students report more confusion around instructions and a heavier writing load.

What students said

“Even though this course was definitely not easy I really enjoyed learning everything that there was being taught”
NURADN403
“The class is straightforward but a lot of work.”
NURADN403
“ ”
NURADN403

Remote format

Online

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are strongly positive, with students praising organization, feedback, recorded lectures, and and .

Main concern

Some students found case studies, discussion boards, and .

What students said

“I felt that the course was well organized and the .”
NURADN403
“She gives , so that helped my grade.”
NURADN403
“The case studies were hard at first but i got the hang of it.”
NURADN403

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and the clearest assessment evidence is writing and project based.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policyFinal project mentionedOnline assignments emphasized

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, or closed-book exam rules.

Final video presentation mentioned
“In ”
NURADN403
“Case studies are too much writing and only worth 5 points.”
NURADN403

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy
“The case studies were hard at first but i got the hang of it.”
NURADN403
“She has recorded lectures and .”
NURADN403

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The course successfully satisfied my learning needs and had a and content.”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“The lectures were very informative for each chapter.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

89/100

“ !”

📚 Workload Reality

55/100

“The case studies were hard at first but i got the hang of it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The lectures, discussions, and the material better
  • .
  • professor Logan provided .

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Work

  • She gives , so that helped my grade.
  • There are 2 extra credits but you have to have a C before even being considered for it.
  • The class is straightforward but a lot of work.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Clarity Issues

  • The directions (which may seem straight forward
  • This professor is not the best. She is very unorganized and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 31 recent reviews show consistent online praise with enough detail to identify workload and instruction risks.

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 524
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

NURADN40331 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 2 · A 13 · A- 5

B range

4

B+ 3 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1