AI Rate Professor

Art

Maria Landsberg

ARTH1 · ART3 · ARTH5 · ARTH19 · ARTH3 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

if you want a warm art professor with , and a strong chance at a high grade.

Best fit · Easy A HunterKind and helpfulExtra creditInteresting lecturesClear study guidesEasy quizzes and tests
  • Students almost universally describe her as kind, caring, and helpful.
  • The course is usually easy to do well in because of , study guides, and .
  • Students still need to keep up with reading, quizzes, deadlines, and occasional group work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

92/100

A high grade is very realistic with basic effort because she gives , study guides, manageable quizzes, and .

Online reviews emphasize easy assignments and , while if students study.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

The content is approachable and engaging, though some readings and theory can add mild challenge.

Online reviews describe the work as very easy, while and occasional heavier theory.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

65/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but participation and engagement are encouraged.

Online attendance is not discussed, while in-person comments say .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students strongly recommend her for , and generous with support.

Both online and and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

91/100

, study guides, easy quizzes, and few grading categories make .

Format shift

Online reviews cite and easy assignments, while and manageable tests.

Workload

Light

82/100

, and small assignments that students generally describe as manageable.

Format shift

Online workload is described as quick and easy, while , and small presentations.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students consistently describe her as kind, helpful, enthusiastic, knowledgeable, and engaging.

Format shift

Both formats strongly support excellent teaching, with online students also praising fast replies.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears , and presentations.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize quizzes and discussions, while in-person , and presentations.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews , and manageable tests when students study.

Main concern

Reading and lectures still matter for quizzes and tests.

What students said

“ doing the reading and you're good.”
ARTH3
“ .”
ARTH1
“Use these two things easy A.”
ARTH1

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews describe an , discussions, and lectures.

Main concern

Students must track deadlines on their own.

What students said

“Very Easy! Offered ”
ARTH5
“she would always answer back within 24hrs.”
ARTH19
“She was very attentive and open to answering any questions we may have.”
ART3

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are described as manageable with studying, but reviews .

Easy quizzes and testsStudy guidesReviews do not clearly prove proctoring policy

Assessment risk

Standard

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests as manageable with reading and study guides.

Easy quizzes and testsStudy guides
“ doing the reading and you're good.”
ARTH3
“ ”
ARTH1

Online

Online reviews mention chapter quizzes and discussions, but do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Chapter quizzesDiscussion postsReviews do not clearly prove online proctoring
“ and discussion post”
ARTH5

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Probably one of the nicest professors out there.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“Very very friendly! Knows how to keep a class running and going even if the students are very quiet.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“ if I could.”

📈 Easy A Potential

92/100

“Use these two things easy A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Really knows how to lecture and keep things interesting and opens the floor for people to talk a lot.
  • Her passion for art is contagious.
  • Very energetic which is something I needed for a night class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Very Easy! Offered
  • Easy quizzes and tests but only if you study.
  • and gives extra reading, not in the textbook.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She is a really kind and helpful professor.
  • she would always answer back within 24hrs.
  • Questions are always welcomed.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 10 reviews across both formats are detailed, recent enough, and extremely consistent.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ARTH34 reviews
ARTH12 reviews
ARTH192 reviews
ART31 review
ARTH51 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 3 · A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1