AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Jerrie Muir

BOOKKEEPING · ACCTG1A · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if the section format and teaching style match how you learn, because student experiences vary sharply.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPatient explanationsFormat dependentPowerPoint heavyPractical assignments
  • In-person reviews are mixed but include strong praise for patience, practical examples, and easy exams.
  • Online reviews conflict, with one severe complaint about missing lectures and one positive review saying effort leads to passing.
  • Students should expect a format-dependent experience rather than a consistently safe choice.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible, but online and and self-teaching.

Online evidence is tougher and more effort-based, while easy.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The content is not described as extreme, but some students felt lost or underprepared because of the teaching style.

Online reviews lean tougher, while preparation.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters appears in online tags, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

The attendance evidence comes mainly from online tags, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Students either strongly praise his patience and practical approach or strongly warn against the class.

In-person reviews are mixed but include more concrete praise, while online reviews are sharply divided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Grades can be strong, but comments .

Format shift

, while online evidence focuses more on effort and confusion than grading leniency.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Assignments may be practical and useful, but online tags mention lots of homework and .

Format shift

Online reviews point to heavier work, while and tasks.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

He is praised for patience and real examples, but criticized for PowerPoint-based teaching and poor online support.

Format shift

, while online teaching has the strongest negative complaint.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and a final rather than one dominant assessment type.

Format shift

and projects, while online evidence does not clearly describe assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and easy exams but also report PowerPoint-heavy lectures and weak preparation for the next course.

Main concern

Teaching .

What students said

“ and if people don't understand.”
Bookkeeping
“The midterm and two projects.”
ACCTG1A
“I do not feel at all prepared for ACCTG-1B.”
ACCTG1A

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online feedback is split between feeling unsupported by PowerPoints and feeling guided through a tough class.

Main concern

One online student said there were no videos or lectures and they had to search everything up.

What students said

“No online videos or lectures posted.”
Bookkeeping
“The class is very tough but if you put in the effort and the time, youll definitely pass.”
ACCTG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

saying the midterm and final are pretty easy.

Easy MidtermEasy FinalProjects

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and and paired with two projects.

Easy MidtermEasy FinalTwo Projects
“The midterm and two projects.”
ACCTG1A

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and if people don't understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, format risk, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“ and if people don't understand.”

⚖️ Format Risk

52/100

“I felt lost most of the class.”

📈 Grade Effort

58/100

“The class is very tough but if you put in the effort and the time, youll definitely pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He really puts effort into his Zoom lectures and tells personal stories from his own business to keep it interesting.
  • He is knowledgable but resorts to PPTs when lecturing.
  • No online videos or lectures posted.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • His class was very easy in the summer courses.
  • The class is very tough but if you put in the effort and the time, youll definitely pass.
  • The midterm and two projects.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Fit

  • I had to search everything up.
  • I do not feel at all prepared for ACCTG-1B.
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews across several years give useful but inconsistent evidence, with strong format differences.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ACCTG1A3 reviews
Bookkeeping2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1