AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Carol Dickerson

ACCT1A1BFT · BUS60 · ACCT1A1B · ACCTG1A · ACCT1A · ACCTG1B · BUSINESSETHICS · ACCTG1A1B · ACCTG1AANDB · 74 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want rigorous accounting structure and can handle a strict, fast-paced professor; avoid online if and support.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear but demandingHeavy homeworkStrict gradingFast-paced lecturesCaring if engaged
  • In-person reviews are sharply mixed but .
  • Online reviews , and workload.
  • Getting an A is doable, but , and practice.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is very possible, but students repeatedly say , and studying consistently.

, while online evidence shows the same workload feels less supported.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Accounting content is not described as impossible, but the , and .

material manageable, while online students say the material is harder to learn independently.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and participation matter, and missing class can seriously hurt performance.

; online reviews focus more on assignments and feedback.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

67/100

She , but online students and students needing patience strongly warn against her.

In-person reviews are polarized but often positive, while online reviews are overwhelmingly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Grades are achievable, but students frequently call her a and .

Format shift

Strict grading appears in both formats, with online students .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Reviews repeatedly mention daily homework, lots of assignments, quizzes, tests, and major study time.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy workload, but online students describe it as more overwhelming and less guided.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Many in-person students praise her clarity and industry knowledge, but negative reviews , and weak online teaching.

Format shift

Teaching quality is much stronger in person than online.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Assessment appears , and occasional projects.

Format shift

, and class work; online reviews mostly mention homework, videos, and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

from students who keep up and several complaints about strictness and tone.

Main concern

The main risk is a strict, fast pace with lots of homework and little room for missed work.

What students said

“ and breaks everything down step by step.”
ACCT1A1B
“Very fast paced when it comes to lectures.”
ACCTG1A

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and a self-taught experience.

Main concern

Students say clarification and .

What students said

“This teacher doesn't TEACH, and .”
ACCT1A
“ !”
ACCT1A1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed, with many reviews mentioning quizzes and tests but little clear proof of .

QuizzesTestsTimed QuizzesTest HeavyNo Exams in One Review

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests, including timed quizzes, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

QuizzesTestsTimed QuizzesNo Exams in One Review
“ .”
ACCTG1A
“ !”
ACCT1A

Online

Online reviews mention tests and heavy work, but they do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Test Heavy
“Gives you hw that catches you off guard because you're thinking she went over it, but she didn't”
ACCT1A1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and breaks everything down step by step.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“ and breaks everything down step by step.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“The class does require a lot of study time and , so if .”

⚖️

34/100

“She doesn't grade easy but it is very doable to get an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The lectures in class make you understand the material.
  • She may be a little snappy but she is willing to help.
  • This teacher doesn't TEACH, and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • You do have to study and prepare.
  • , and .
  • It will be hard to get your grade up if you miss any.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support and Tone

  • She genuinely wants all her students to succeed.
  • She wants you to be successful.
  • PROFESSOR SNAPPED AT ME AT THE END OF IN-PERSON CLASS. MADE ME CRY.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

74

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years give strong evidence, though opinions are polarized and formats differ sharply.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 548
4 out of 59
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 512

Course coverage

ACCT1A16 reviews
BUS609 reviews
ACCT1A1B8 reviews
ACCTG1A7 reviews
ACCTG1B4 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ACCTG1AANDB3 reviews
ACCT1A1BFT1 review
ACCTG1A1B1 review
BUSINESSETHICS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

45 reported outcomes

A range

25

A+ 6 · A 16 · A- 3

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 4

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

2

D 2

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1