AI Rate Professor

Mathematics & Science

Cammie Hsu

STAT10 · MATH520 · MATH450 · MATH25 · MATH420 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can keep up with steady work, but if you need strong instructor-created lectures.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy HomeworkPop QuizzesMixed Teaching QualityCaring In PersonTough Grading
  • Workload is consistently heavy across formats.
  • In-person reviews are more positive about help and .
  • Getting an A is possible, but it requires staying current and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

An A is realistic for organized students, but , and .

Online evidence is harsher, while but still requires steady work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The math content is manageable when explained well, but fast pacing, weak online lecture support, and .

Online students report more self-teaching, while and examples.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

In-person comments repeatedly say missing class hurts because of notes, participation, and random pop quizzes.

; online reviews focus more on quiz windows and deadlines.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

and help, but online students and weaker math students report frustration.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Several reviews call her a , though students can still earn A grades by staying on top of the work.

Format shift

pain point in online MATH25.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Nearly every review mentions lots of .

Format shift

Both online and .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

She can be helpful and , but online reviews and some in-person reviews criticize unrelated lectures and mistakes.

Format shift

Teaching quality is noticeably stronger in in-person comments than in online comments.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Grades , and at least one online final paper/video assignment.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, tests, and a final paper/video, while , and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are split, with strong praise for helpfulness but , and occasional lecture mistakes.

Main concern

The main risk is a heavy quiz-and-homework rhythm with little benefit from skipping class.

What students said

“There was a significant amount of homework and many quizzes, but as long as you stay on top of things, it's manageable.”
STAT10
“ .”
MATH420

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe heavy homework, self-teaching from videos, and expectations.

Main concern

Students often feel they must teach themselves while and .

What students said

“ .”
MATH25
“Most of it is studying by yourself and even then it's difficult to grasp the subjects that .”
MATH25

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show frequent quizzes and tests, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, closed-book rules, webcam proctoring, or Lockdown Browser use.

Frequent QuizzesTest HeavyFinal Paper And Video

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests, but do not clearly prove the .

Pop QuizzesTest Heavy
“Beware of pop quizzes”
MATH25
“reviewed with .”
STAT10

Online

Online reviews mention short quiz windows, tests, and a final paper with a video showing the student's face, but .

Short Quiz WindowTest HeavyFinal Paper And Video
“Quizzes only available for 24-48 hours max, Sunday and Monday.”
MATH25
“Requires a paper for the final & a 10 minute video required that you show your face & dress professionally.”
MATH25

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There was a significant amount of homework and many quizzes, but as long as you stay on top of things, it's manageable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“She definitely knows how to give different examples to make sure you understand the section she is teaching.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“ and the lectures given sometime did not relate to the material.”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“ . Hsu for a math course.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a great instructor.
  • Lectures mostly from YouTube, sometimes not even covering the subject.
  • She was constantly making mistakes on the board during lectures and students would correct her.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Straight A student but barely got a C in this class.
  • with a proper work ethic you will have no trouble with this course.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews across 2018-2025 give useful but mixed evidence, with only three online reviews.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH254 reviews
MATH4201 review
MATH4501 review
MATH5201 review
STAT101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2