AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Leonard Crow

CALC1ANDCALC3 · MATH520 · SOC10 · MATH450 · MATH65A · MATH25 · MATH81 · MATH65B · MATH85 · CALC1 · STATS10 · MTH425 · MATH410 · MATH75 · 114 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you want a caring but demanding math instructor and are ready to study hard, especially outside Stats.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerClear when alignedTest heavyLots of homeworkCaring but demandingMixed teaching fit
  • Recent reviews are much stronger than older ones, especially for Stats and higher math students who use his study guidance.
  • Math courses can be proof-heavy, test-heavy, and always match examples.
  • Online Stats is much easier than online or in-person calculus-style courses.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

An A is realistic in easier Stats or for prepared math students, but many , and strong concept mastery.

Online evidence is easier in Stats but harsher in older calculus courses, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Stats can feel easy, but calculus, linear algebra, and proof-heavy math courses are often conceptually demanding.

Online Stats reviews raise the easiness score, while and proof-based exams.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

as formally mandatory, but many students say skipping class makes success much harder.

Online attendance evidence is mostly about notes and videos, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

and math rigor, but many warn against taking him if they need simpler examples or lighter tests.

Online recommendation is strongest for Stats, while and learning style.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

49/100

Some , and leniency, but many others call him a tough grader with grades based on few tests.

Format shift

Online grading is easiest in Stats but stricter in calculus reviews, while .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of , and test preparation are common themes across many math reviews.

Format shift

Online Stats is lighter, but online calculus and .

Teaching experience

Average

67/100

Recent students often praise clear lectures and care, but older and , and rushed teaching.

Format shift

Online teaching looks strong for Stats and weaker in older recorded math courses, while but recently more positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

Grades are frequently driven by tests, quizzes, finals, and as preparation.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes and finals, while as the main grade driver.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a knowledgeable, caring professor , and much better for prepared math students.

Main concern

Many students struggle when exams feel harder or and lecture examples.

What students said

“Great professor and provided great lectures on all the content throughout the course.”
MATH81
“The , and 200 points for a .”
MATH75
“IF YOU ARE A MATH MAJOR, his class IS for you.”
MATH65B

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews split sharply between easy, clear Stats classes and older difficult calculus-style classes with .

Main concern

Online calculus reviews report exams and lectures that do not always prepare students well.

What students said

“I took the Intro to Stats course online and it was super easy.”
STATS10
“You have to do well on all of the quizzes and the .”
MATH65A
“His handwriting is so damn awful its so hard to understand sometimes”
MATH75

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam friendliness varies by course, with but many difficult, proof-heavy, test-heavy experiences.

Test HeavyTake-Home Exams MentionedOpen Note Quizzes MentionedCheat Sheets MentionedProof-Based Exams

Assessment risk

Varies

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe test-heavy grading with , and proof-based exams, but no clear proctoring policy.

Test HeavyTake-Home Exams MentionedCheat Sheet AllowedProof-Based ExamsTest Corrections
“ and the .”
MATH85
“Allows cheat sheets, great to communicate with.”
MATH65B
“all of and 70% proof based”
MATH81

Online

Online reviews mention easy short quizzes in Stats, open-note quizzes in one calculus class, and , but do not clearly prove proctoring rules.

Short QuizzesOpen Note QuizzesTake-Home Exam MentionedFew Graded Exams
“The tests have 2 attempts and are ~ 5 questions, pretty easy and some true or false.”
STATS10
“The reason I passed was because .”
MATH65A
“it became time consuming to learn every material before the ”
MATH65B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's a great professor who truly wants his students to succeed & learn.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting teaching, grading, workload, and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

67/100

“Great professor and provided great lectures on all the content throughout the course.”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“Lots of homework (although you get plenty of time to do it), but it helped a lot for Calc 3 and diff eq.”

🧪

52/100

“The , and 200 points for a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He teaches with patience; when students don't understand a .
  • Dr. Crow made Calc 3 very interesting and always made me look forward to learning in class.
  • This man does not teach you. Goes over the content once, moves on.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • For Linear expect to do a lot of studying if you want to succeed.
  • The wish it was the other way around.
  • if u attending his classes.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He is reasonable with assignments and his work load, and he does care about your well being.
  • , and he wishes me good luck
  • Very helpful professor and cares about his students passing.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

114

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years and courses provide rich but course-dependent evidence, with recent reviews improving the overall picture.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 535
4 out of 520
3 out of 510
2 out of 519
1 out of 531

Course coverage

MATH759 reviews
MATH65B6 reviews
MATH816 reviews
STATS106 reviews
MATH255 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MATH4505 reviews
MATH4103 reviews
MATH65A3 reviews
MATH852 reviews
CALC11 review
CALC1ANDCALC31 review
MATH5201 review
MTH4251 review
SOC101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

39 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 1 · A 13 · A- 3

B range

10

B+ 3 · B 7

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

2

D 2

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2