AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Candice Piper

NURAD0000 · NURVN6043 · NURVN407L · NURVN403 · BIOL30 · NURVN405 · NURVN1SEM · NSG101 · NURVN · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
17/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
36.36%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

unless you are comfortable self-teaching under stressful grading conditions.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-taught courseTough gradingPersonal tangentsTest heavyMixed online record
  • Most in-person nursing reviews say students had to teach themselves and felt unsupported.
  • Online BIOL30 reviews are mixed, with two positive easy-course comments and one disorganized negative comment.
  • Grades can be high, but the comments describe high stress, weak instruction, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Some students earned A grades, but most comments say , and surviving difficult tests.

Online BIOL30 looks easier, while and stress.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The content feels harder because , and unclear exams.

Online BIOL30 appears closer to standard difficulty, while as challenging due to poor support.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though one in-person review warns students can be kicked out for behavior in class.

Attendance evidence comes mainly from in-person comments, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

because they say she does not teach, goes off topic, and leaves students stressed.

Online reviews are split, but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

and failing-student comments outweigh the few high grades and positive online notes.

Format shift

Online grading includes clear criteria in two reviews, while and tests tough.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students , and self-teaching demands.

Format shift

Online BIOL30 had easier discussions in one review, but and preparation.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most comments say lectures are off topic, textbook-based, or ineffective, with students learning on their own.

Format shift

Online teaching has a few positive BIOL30 comments, while as consistently poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews emphasize tests, math exams, reading-based exam questions, and .

Format shift

Online BIOL30 mentions assignments and tests, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person nursing reviews are overwhelmingly negative, repeatedly describing , and poor support.

Main concern

The main concern is weak instruction combined with and grading.

What students said

“ . SHE DOES NOT TEACH!”
NURVN403
“Good luck and be prepared to teach yourself.”
NURVN405
“ to understand.”
NURVN405

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online BIOL30 evidence is mixed but generally easier than the nursing reviews, with one serious complaint about disorganization.

Main concern

The main concern is last-minute material changes and .

What students said

“ . .”
BIOL30
“Basically taught myself this entire semester.”
BIOL30

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Overall exam risk is high because in-person and unclear math exams, while online BIOL30 had untimed tests and .

Test HeavyReading-Based ExamsUnclear Math ExamsUntimed Online TestsNo Online Final Mentioned

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person , and reading-based exam questions, but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring rules.

Test HeavyUnclear Math ExamsReading-Based Exams
“ .”
NURVN403
“ and that WILL be on the exam.”
NURVN6043

Online

Online reviews mention untimed tests and no final in one BIOL30 course, but do not clearly prove open-book, webcam, proctoring, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Untimed TestsNo Final Mentioned
“ . .”
BIOL30

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Good luck and be prepared to teach yourself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“ . SHE DOES NOT TEACH!”

⚖️

24/100

“A lot students are failing and she can careless.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“ and you again have to teach yourself.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures relied heavily on reading from the textbook with .
  • Everything I learned in her class was self taught.
  • to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A lot students are failing and she can careless.
  • .
  • She dropped 4 lvn students.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • , and the lectures mainly discuss diseases and disorders.
  • . .
  • Basically taught myself this entire semester.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

89/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 22 reviews span many years, include detailed comments, and show a .

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 513

Course coverage

NURVN4057 reviews
NURVN4034 reviews
BIOL303 reviews
NURVN3 reviews
NSG1011 review
Show 4 more courses
NURAD00001 review
NURVN1SEM1 review
NURVN407L1 review
NURVN60431 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1