AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Fatemeh Khatami

MATH520 · ARTH1 · MATH425 · MATH25 · MATH410 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
76.92%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want a and rewards steady effort.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring teacherClear explanationsExtra creditPatient helpModerate homework
  • Most students describe her as caring, patient, and strong at explaining math step by step.
  • In-person students are much more enthusiastic than online students, who mention delayed replies and reused lecture material.
  • The class is usually fair and passable, but some sections have hard exams, lots of .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Students often earn strong grades with , and studying, but online and harder sections are not automatic A's.

Online evidence says the class can be easy but not an easy A, while steady participation and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Her step-by-step teaching makes math feel manageable for many students, though some .

, while online reviews depend more on self-study materials.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, and one review says she takes attendance at the beginning and end of class.

; online reviews do not clearly describe attendance rules.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend her because , and willing to help students understand math.

, while online reviews are more cautious because of slow replies and borrowed materials.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

and helpful support are common, but some students report and few graded items.

Format shift

, while online reviews give limited grading detail.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

the section, with several students mentioning lots of homework or WebAssign.

Format shift

Online workload appears structured and manageable, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students repeatedly praise , and willingness to answer questions.

Format shift

In-person teaching reviews are excellent, while online reviews are weaker because much content is not directly taught by her.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Reviews mention homework, WebAssign, , and , so assessment is mixed rather than exam-only.

Format shift

Online assessment details are vague, while , and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are strongly positive, especially , and extra help.

Main concern

A few students mention hard exams, lots of .

What students said

“Ask a question 100 times, and she'll answer each 1 of them with a smile.”
MATH25
“She takes her time explaining so that no body falls behind.”
MATH520
“ and she does not give study guides.”
MATH425

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with students finding the class structured or easy but and limited original teaching.

Main concern

Online students may need to learn from posted .

What students said

“It was not an easy A.”
MATH25
“overall the class is easy.”
MATH25

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam friendliness varies by section, with some students calling tests easy and .

Easy tests in some sectionsHard tests in some sectionsExam review may not match examNo clear proctoring evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring policies.

Easy tests in some sectionsHard tests in some sectionsExam review mismatch
“ ”
MATH410
“ and she does not give study guides.”
MATH425
“the " is not very much related to the exam”
MATH410

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Ask a question 100 times, and she'll answer each 1 of them with a smile.”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“She takes her time explaining so that no body falls behind.”

👍 Recommendation Level

82/100

“A !”

📈 Effort For Grades

72/100

“Just pay attention in class and turn in all assignments and do the she offers and study for her exams and you'll pass with an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • so carefully that even I was able to understand.
  • She doesn't skip any steps and .
  • She made Math fun and enjoyable and easy to learn.

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • She wants every single one of her students to succeed without any biases.
  • Will go the extra mile to help her students understand.
  • and helpful.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload And Exams

  • It was not an easy A.
  • and she does not give study guides.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The rating uses 23 reviews across online and in-person formats with detailed and and workload.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH4258 reviews
MATH4107 reviews
MATH255 reviews
34391 review
ARTH11 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH5201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 5

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 5

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather_Not_Say 1