AI Rate Professor

Statistics

Rosa Davila

STAT10 · MATH31 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
85/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
73.33%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

and usually fair class, especially in statistics, but if you need deep conceptual math explanations.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLenient And CaringFun Statistics ClassMixed Math ExplanationsShow-Up MattersFair Tests
  • Most students describe her as caring, funny, lenient, and willing to help students succeed.
  • Statistics reviews are much stronger than some math reviews, where students report and .
  • Grades are often strong, but success usually depends on showing up, asking questions, and doing the work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Grades are often high and students mention leniency, , and flexible deadlines, but the A and doing assignments.

In-person reviews strongly support an easier A, while the but organization is weaker.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Statistics feels approachable due to patient support, but some math reviews describe fast pacing and .

In-person evidence is mixed by course, while but limited conceptual explanation.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

and due-date information, but reviews do not show a .

In-person students often say showing up matters, and the online review says dates were communicated in class.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

and lenient, though several warn that , and communication can be weak.

, while the single online review is more cautious.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students repeatedly mention leniency, , deadline flexibility, and many reported A-range grades.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most leniency evidence, while the and .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Several students say homework is light or done in class, but others report lots of .

Format shift

In-person workload evidence is mixed, and the single online review does not clearly describe workload volume.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most reviews praise her patience and care, but negative , and confusing help.

Format shift

math-specific complaints, while the online review is more critical of explanations.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and projects, with some classes replacing the final test with a project.

Format shift

, and homework, while the online review mentions tests and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, emphasizing caring , and some workload or .

Main concern

Some math students say homework is heavy, pacing is fast, or .

What students said

“She's very lenient and genuinely wants you to succeed in her class.”
STAT10
“It is a very easy A but if you will not learn anything.”
MATH31
“Gives alot of work and goes through the material too fast.”
MATH31

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and tests are fair but and schedule communication are weak.

Main concern

Online students may need to track dates carefully and learn concepts independently.

What students said

“She can show the "what" just not explain the "how" or "why" for a concept.”
MATH31
“Her tests and .”
MATH31

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally described as fair and sometimes student-friendly, but some math reviews say tests can be harder or different from instruction.

Fair Tests And QuizzesNotes Allowed On TestProject Instead Of Final TestTests Similar To Study Guides

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

76/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

tests, and some project-based finals, but a few math reviews report difficult or mismatched exams.

Notes Allowed On TestProject Instead Of Final TestTests Similar To Study GuidesSome Difficult Exams
“There is but a .”
STAT10
“Notes are allowed in test”
STAT10
“ gave us which made the tests fair.”
MATH31
“the .”
MATH31

Online

The online review says tests and quizzes are fair but does not .

Fair Tests And QuizzesReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy
“Her tests and .”
MATH31

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's very lenient and genuinely wants you to succeed in her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ , and truly cares about her students succeeding.”

📈 Easy A Potential

82/100

“It is a very easy A but if you will not learn anything.”

⚖️

82/100

“Allows us to improve our grades in many ways.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor is very interactive with her students and takes her time to help each student learn.
  • She loved to include her hobbies into the learning concept which really always sprouted very great teaching mechanisms.
  • She can show the "what" just not explain the "how" or "why" for a concept.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Work

  • She's super lenient and and she does a really good job of explaining in her lectures.
  • The but that just depended on you and your open time.
  • Gives alot of work and goes through the material too fast.

Theme 3

🧪 About Tests

  • gave us which made the tests fair.
  • There is but a .
  • Her tests and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews across multiple years provide detailed and mostly consistent patterns, though experiences vary by course and format.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

STAT106 reviews
MATH-315 reviews
MATH314 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 5 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values