AI Rate Professor

Communication Studies

Windy Norris

COMM6 · SPESPE · COMMSTD8 · COMMUPUBL · COMM103 · COM8 · A111 · CMSTD2 · COMMU6 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Avoid her if and , but consider her if you want a demanding communication class.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDisorganized expectationsHeavy workloadTough gradingPassionate but polarizingUnclear communication
  • Students are split between calling her inspiring and warning that the class is disorganized.
  • Many negative , and workload beyond a typical 3-credit class.
  • Students who like structure, speeches, and active participation may benefit, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

exists, but many students say , and heavy writing make an A hard to secure.

The single online review is negative and difficult, while and repeated complaints about harsh grading.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course content may not be conceptually impossible, but disorganization, writing, speeches, readings, and .

Online evidence emphasizes unclear instructions, while , and confusing tests.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

because students report being called out for lateness and needing to attend to pass.

; the online review does not clearly discuss attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Recommendation is low because many detailed reviews warn , and dismissive communication.

Online evidence is entirely negative, while in-person evidence is polarized but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students repeatedly say she is a and makes A grades unusually hard.

Format shift

The , and in-person reviews give detailed examples of strict speech and .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Reviews cite lots of , and quizzes for a 3-credit class.

Format shift

Online workload detail is limited, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Some students find her passionate and inspiring, but , and impatient communication.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is negative; and confusing organization.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment appears , and tests.

Format shift

Most assessment evidence is in person, with the online .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are polarized, with some students loving her passion and others describing disorganization, heavy work, and .

Main concern

and strict evaluation.

What students said

“It is impossible to get an A in this class.”
COM8
“She helped me understand more than any other teacher.”
COMMSTD8
“Don't even think about it.”
COM8

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is strongly negative and says the syllabus and and ineffective.

Main concern

and difficult to follow.

What students said

“ and all over the place with her instructions.”
CMSTD2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and , but reviews do not clearly prove book, proctoring, or webcam policies.

Hard TestsQuizzesFill-In-The-Blank TestsSpeechesPresentations

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person , and presentations, but no clear book or proctoring policy.

Hard TestsQuizzesFill-In-The-Blank TestsSpeechesPresentations
“ .”
COMM6
“ ”
A111
“The study.”
COMMUPUBL

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, open-book policy, or quiz structure.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . The work isn't difficult, but she is very impatient with questions, a , and disorganized.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and polarized teaching quality. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“She helped me understand more than any other teacher.”

⚖️

22/100

“A students get B's in her class.”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“This professor does too much for a 3 credit class and leaves you a bunch of .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Has passion for teaching.
  • Her ability to effectively communicate is extremely ineffective
  • She confuses you about the assignments and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It is impossible to get an A in this class.
  • she gives lots of .
  • The work isn't difficult, but she is very impatient with questions, a , and disorganized.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • This professor does too much for a 3 credit class
  • this class requires a LOT of writing, a few presentations
  • my class was an excellerated class, and it was a speech a week.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews over a long time span provide useful credibility, though several are old or very brief.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 58
1 out of 54

Course coverage

COM86 reviews
COMM63 reviews
COMMSTD83 reviews
CMSTD22 reviews
A1111 review
Show 4 more courses
COMM1031 review
COMMU61 review
COMMUPUBL1 review
SPESPE1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 3 · A- 2

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values