AI Rate Professor

Art

Gail DeAngelis

ART3 · PHOTO1 · ARTH3 · ARTHIS3 · PHOT1 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
84.62%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you are comfortable with steady writing and want a and responds quickly.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and responsiveWriting-heavyClear expectationsEasy gradingHelpful feedback
  • Students consistently praise her responsiveness, care, organization, and feedback.
  • The class is often easy to pass with an A, but it can be writing-heavy and time-consuming.
  • Online reviews are more divided because weekly essays and readings feel heavy to some students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A is very realistic because and , but students must keep up with regular writing.

In-person evidence sounds easier and more manageable, while online evidence shows more writing-heavy effort despite high grades.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The and well explained, but the writing volume can make the course feel harder than the concepts.

, while online reviews are split between easy structure and heavy essays.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Participation matters in discussions and assignments, but reviews .

Online reviews emphasize discussion participation, while and completing assigned work.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend her because , and grades fairly.

Both formats are mostly positive, though online students are more likely to warn about workload.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

Many students report easy or , and high A outcomes when work is completed.

Format shift

Both formats support lenient grading, with online reviews adding that grades still depend on completing writing assignments.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The workload is manageable for many students but , and multiple assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews report heavier writing more often, while as simpler and easier to manage.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students consistently describe her as , and .

Format shift

Both formats praise her teaching, with online students especially noting fast replies and study guides.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment centers on essays, discussions, papers, projects, and a .

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly essays and quizzes, while in-person reviews mention writing, papers, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are very positive, , and a caring professor.

Main concern

Students still need to handle writing and .

What students said

“doesn't give excess busy work”
PHOTO1
“There is a lot of writing involved, but its simple.”
PHOTO1

Remote format

Online

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and , but repeatedly warn about weekly writing and assignments.

Main concern

The , and reading-based work.

What students said

“ .”
PHOTO1
“She grades well and gets back to you asap.”
PHOTO1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and usually manageable, though one online review describes essay-style exams as demanding.

Study GuidesQuizzesMidterm And Final Study GuidesEssay Exams Mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews do not clearly prove a specific exam format, .

Online

and final study guides, and one complaint about four-page essay exams.

Study GuidesThree QuizzesFinal QuizEssay Exams
“She had 3 quizzes and the ”
PHOTO1
“Exams were 4 page essays.”
PHOTO1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class itself can be tough as there is a good amount of work and writing but it was pretty interesting.”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“ and if you find a good rhythm, you are sure to pass this class with a good grade.”

📚 Workload

52/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“ so much and even more, any classes with this professor.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The professor was amazing and so sweet.

Theme 2

✍️ About Writing Load

  • there is quite a bit of writing.
  • There is a lot of writing because of the history of photography

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • it's a pretty easy class to pass with an A, since Prof. DeAngelis grades very lightly.
  • She grades well and gets back to you asap.
  • She is lenient in grading as long as you put effort in.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 26 reviews across several years with consistent praise and .

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 50
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHOTO120 reviews
ART32 reviews
PHOT12 reviews
ARTH31 review
ARTHIS31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 12 · A 4 · A- 4

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1