AI Rate Professor

Communication Studies

Hannah Carter

COMSTD2 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can tolerate long lectures and steady work for a manageable but uneven class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardBoring lecturesStrict gradingTime consumingMixed teaching qualityParticipation matters
  • Reviews are sharply split between strong praise and strong warnings.
  • Negative reviews focus on boring lectures, strict grading, self-teaching, and .
  • Positive reviews say the class can be manageable with notes, reading, and steady participation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

The class is not conceptually hard, but , and time-consuming work reduce the easy-A value.

Online evidence suggests a clearer A path, while and group project risk.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The material sounds manageable, but long lectures, reading, speeches, and .

Online reviews call it time consuming and lecture-heavy, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Reviews , but participation and class discussions appear important.

Online evidence mentions mandatory peer responses, while and class environment.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Students are divided because and useful while others find the class boring and poorly taught.

Online reviews are split, and review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Several students call her a tough or , though .

Format shift

, while online reviews are mixed.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Work includes readings, discussions, peer responses, speeches, group projects, and a but time consuming.

Format shift

Online reviews describe weekly discussions and recorded speeches, while , and notes.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with complaints about dull lectures and self-teaching .

Format shift

Online reviews split between boring and simple, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

The class , and a final rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

Online assessment includes discussions, speeches, and a final, while , and speeches.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but several complaints about dull lectures and strict grading.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Prof. Carter's lectures were dull.”
COMSTD-2
“She is very strict with her grading, DOESN'T give ”
COMSTD-2
“Class was lively- discussions were fun & she has a sense of humor.”
COMSTD-2

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

one calls it boring, while another says the A path is simple but time consuming.

Main concern

The online class may feel lecture-heavy and tedious.

What students said

“just a bunch of lectures that are a bore”
COMSTD-2
“Not difficult just time consuming.”
COMSTD-2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and tests, with no clear proof of proctoring, open-book rules, or .

50 Question FinalTestsTextbook-Based FinalTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals tied to presentations and textbook reading, but do not clearly prove book policy or proctoring.

TestsTextbook-Based FinalTest Heavy
“ as it is important for the finals!”
COMSTD-2
“Test heavy”
COMSTD-2

Online

Online reviews mention a 50-question final but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

50 Question Final
“2 video recorded speeches, and a 50 question final.”
COMSTD-2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not difficult just time consuming.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation split. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“Felt like a teach-yourself class.”

⚖️

35/100

“She is very strict with her grading, DOESN'T give ”

📚 Workload Reality

50/100

“Not difficult just time consuming.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Prof. Carter's lectures were dull.
  • Class was lively- discussions were fun & she has a sense of humor.
  • The lectures she does give are extremely long and boring and do not cover the

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Effort

  • .
  • .
  • She is very strict with her grading, DOESN'T give

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Thursdays and mandatory peer responses due Sunday
  • as it is important for the finals!
  • just a bunch of lectures that are a bore

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Six recent reviews provide useful detail, but opinions are highly polarized and the sample is small.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

COMSTD-26 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

5

B+ 4 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values