AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Marisol Rivera

ETHN2 · ETHN5 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Only take Marisol Rivera if you can handle inconsistent support and , because the risk of a poor experience is high.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHighly inconsistent experienceUnclear instructionsDelayed gradingWeak communicationEngaging when prepared
  • Reviews are sharply split, with one excellent in-person experience and two very negative experiences.
  • Negative reviews focus , and lack of support.
  • The small review count makes confidence limited, but the warning signs are serious.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Grades may be possible, but , and weak support make the path to an A unreliable.

Online evidence only says to avoid the professor, while class and a poorly supported one.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The material can be easy to understand with engagement, but and poor structure can make the course feel harder.

The positive in-person review says activities made material easy, while the negative online and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

The recommendation level is low because two of three reviews are strongly negative and cite avoidable course-management problems.

The online review is negative, and and a severe complaint.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

The because one student did not know their grade for weeks and felt support could have changed the outcome.

Format shift

The , while the online review gives no grading details.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The workload is not clearly described as heavy overall, but group work and preparation expectations may create friction.

Format shift

In-person evidence mentions engagement and a group project, while online evidence gives no workload details.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with one engaging positive review outweighed by , and poor communication.

Format shift

Online evidence is negative but vague, while and awful experiences.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

and a group project than exams, though details are limited.

Format shift

and a group project, while online evidence gives no assessment details.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews conflict sharply, with one praising engaging activities and another , and poor communication.

Main concern

Students may face inconsistent teaching , and weak responsiveness.

What students said

“I absolutely loved this class!”
ETHN2
“I absolutely have learned nothing from this class.”
ETHN2

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is very negative and gives no detail .

Main concern

The review provides a strong warning but almost no specific evidence.

What students said

“ ”
ETHN5

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the Lockdown Browser policy.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, midterm, final, proctoring, open-book, or .

Online

The online review does not clearly prove the quiz, midterm, final, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I absolutely have learned nothing from this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting split teaching experiences, organization problems, and low-confidence format differences. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“I absolutely have learned nothing from this class.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

32/100

“ ”

📋 Course Structure

35/100

“ and don't bother emailing her in hopes of a quick response.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She had enjoyable activities that made the material fun and easy to understand.
  • I absolutely have learned nothing from this class.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Organization

  • I didn't know my grade till 9 weeks into the course because .
  • and don't bother emailing her in hopes of a quick response.

Theme 3

📈 About Student Effort

  • If the material and prepare for the following lesson, you will maximize your experience in her class and pass with flying colors.
  • Felt I could have gotten an A if she was actually here to help.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 reviews are available, opinions are highly inconsistent, and one online review is too vague to support detailed conclusions.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ETHN22 reviews
ETHN51 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values