AI Rate Professor

English

Deanna Hernandez

ENGL1A · ENG1A · ENG475 · EP7C2SKT · ENGLISH575 · ENGL475 · ENGLISH1A · ENG1B · ENGA1 · ENGLISH475 · ENGL495 · ENG575 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
85/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a and can keep up with steady writing work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring mentorEssay heavyDetailed feedbackExtra creditSlow grading
  • Most students praise her as , and helpful with writing.
  • The workload is writing-heavy, with , and revisions.
  • The biggest recurring complaint is slow grading, especially when feedback is needed for later assignments.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Good grades are common when students complete the writing, follow rubrics, and revise, but the workload prevents this from being an effortless A.

Online reviews stress labor and , while as worthwhile.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The content is not usually described as conceptually hard, but the , and critical thinking create real work.

Online reviews describe more labor-intensive assignments, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Attendance and participation matter in several in-person reviews, but the policy is not consistently described as strictly mandatory.

In-person reviews mention participation and showing up; and assignment timing.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend her because , and helps students improve despite a demanding workload.

, while online reviews are more divided because of workload and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

She can be tough and slow to grade, but , and flexibility make grading feel fair overall.

Format shift

and delays more often, while in-person reviews mention flexibility and more often.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students , and weekly assignments, even when they like the class.

Format shift

Online reviews describe back-to-back essays and discussion posts, while but substantial for English.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students consistently describe her as , and .

Format shift

In-person reviews are especially enthusiastic, while online reviews are more mixed but still include strong praise for feedback and care.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Grades appear , and revisions rather than exams.

Format shift

Both online and in-person reviews focus on papers and in-class final essay.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly , and useful writing practice despite substantial essay work.

Main concern

Participation and sustained writing effort are expected.

What students said

“ and motivation.”
ENG1A
“YES, THE WORK IS TOUGH (NOT EASY) BUT .”
ENGLISH475
“The work isn't hard it just takes time.”
ENG575

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are more mixed, praising care and rubrics while , and .

Main concern

the next assignment.

What students said

“She .”
ENGL1A
“ and you'll already have the next one due in a couple days.”
ENG1A
“This professor takes unnecessary amounts of time to grade”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mostly describe paper-based assessment, and they do not clearly prove online proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or .

EssaysDiscussion PostsResearch PaperIn-Class Final Essay

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and one in-class final essay, but do not clearly prove closed-book exams or strict proctoring.

EssaysResearch PaperIn-Class Final Essay
“ paper”
ENGL1A
“ 3-8 pages each”
ENGA1
“an in .”
ENGA1

Online

Online reviews mention essays, discussions, and rubrics, but do not clearly prove any webcam, proctoring, open-book, quiz, midterm, or .

EssaysDiscussion PostsRubric-Based Assignments
“Be prepared to for a lot of community discussions and back .”
ENG1A
“it's more so meeting the .”
ENG1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“YES, THE WORK IS TOUGH (NOT EASY) BUT .”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Ms.D is awesome! She really cares about all her students.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Reality

35/100

“She gives out 4-5 assignments every week.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and motivation.
  • She makes it fun. .
  • No questions are stupid in her class.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • The work isn't hard it just takes time.
  • Offers .
  • Discussion posts must add up to 1,000 words; .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • and .
  • She .
  • She's helpful and she really cares about all her students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-eight reviews across many years and both formats provide detailed, mostly consistent evidence with .

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG1A7 reviews
ENG4754 reviews
ENGL1A4 reviews
ENG5753 reviews
ENG1B2 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ENGLISH1A2 reviews
ENGA11 review
ENGL4751 review
ENGL4951 review
ENGLISH4751 review
ENGLISH5751 review
EP7C2SKT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

23 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 4 · A 10 · A- 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1