AI Rate Professor

English

Zeanissia Moore

ENG575 · ENG1A · ENG475 · 1A · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
31.82%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid Zeanissia Moore unless you are and inconsistent communication.

Best fit · Self Taught ProVery unorganizedUnclear assignmentsPoor communicationLots of papersMixed kindness
  • The dominant , and poor communication.
  • Some students say and that the class can be passed by adapting to her style.
  • Recent reviews are especially negative, with several students strongly .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Passing with a good grade is possible, but , and inconsistent grading make the effort unpredictable.

Online evidence includes one easy-course review and , while in-person evidence shows grades vary widely despite heavy confusion.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

English content may not be inherently hard, but and poor explanations make the course feel difficult.

Online evidence is split, while and assignments create the main difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Several tags and comments suggest attending class and participation are important, but .

Online attendance rules are not clearly proven, while , and asking questions.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students do not recommend her because of , and slow or vague responses.

Online recommendation is split, while and especially harsh in recent years.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Some students pass or earn As, but , and poor feedback make grading feel unreliable.

Format shift

Online grading evidence is mixed, while in-person reviews include both easy-grader comments and .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students frequently mention lots of , and last-minute assignments.

Format shift

Online workload is described as easy by one student but homework-heavy by tags, while and assignments.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

The strongest pattern is unclear , and poor communication.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is split, while older praise for caring.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment appears dominated , and some quizzes rather than major exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention essays and coursework, while , and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews mostly describe , unclear assignments, poor communication, and , though some older reviews praise her care.

Main concern

Students often feel lost because , and .

What students said

“ .”
ENG1A
“Basically your .”
1A

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are and one strongly negative experience about disorganization and .

Main concern

Canvas organization and communication are unreliable.

What students said

“Not very good with Canvas, but the coursework is very easy!”
ENG1A
“she never answer me and if she does after 1 week or 10 days”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and assessment seems mostly papers with occasional quizzes and few tests.

Few Tests MentionedBook QuizzesPapers And EssaysExam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and book quizzes, but do not clearly prove proctoring, book rules beyond one quiz comment, or .

Few TestsBook Quizzes
“ .”
ENG475
“we were able to use the book for it!”
ENG475

Online

Online reviews do not clearly .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Basically your .”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“Basically your .”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

28/100

“0/10 do not recommend.”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“Too many papers at once to the students and herself.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She does not give relevant lectures, explain her assignments .
  • Her and everywhere.
  • .

Theme 2

📚

  • Lots of homework
  • She did assign a lot of turnitin
  • Too many papers at once to the students and herself.

Theme 3

📣 About Communication

  • .
  • she never answer me and if she does after 1 week or 10 days
  • When asked questions, give vague answers, it takes forever to get a asignment.

Theme 4

❤️ Positive Minority View

  • and very understanding.
  • She's funny and enjoyed her class
  • She'll make sure you pass the class as long as you participate and knows that you're trying.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-five reviews across many years provide strong evidence, and the repeated complaints about organization and clarity are consistent.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 510

Course coverage

1A9 reviews
ENG1A9 reviews
ENG4756 reviews
ENG5751 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 4 · A- 3

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

5

C+ 2 · C 3

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1