AI Rate Professor

English

Phil Quaranta

ENGL1B · ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENGLIH1B · HIST1C · ENGLI1BC · ENGL6408 · ENGLISH1A · ENG1B · ENGLISH1B · ENG1C · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if and can adapt to a flexible, sometimes unclear structure.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDiscussion drivenCreative essaysUnorganized at timesParticipation mattersMixed grading fairness
  • Students often praise his passion, humor, and ability to make writing interesting.
  • Grades are usually manageable for students who attend, participate, and follow his writing expectations.
  • A , and occasional complaints about favoritism or harsh grading.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic if students attend, participate, revise carefully, and meet his writing expectations, but it is not effortless.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The content is typical English composition and literature work, but essays, reading, and class.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Many reviews say participation and showing up are important, with some warning that missing class hurts success.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

and support, but enough students report disorganization and unfairness to keep the recommendation cautious.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and manageable for prepared students, but several reviews describe tough or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The , and participation, with several students saying it is manageable but not light.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Students often find him passionate, interesting, and helpful, but his organization and clarity vary sharply by reviewer.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades , and participation rather than formal exams.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

can be rewarding but inconsistent in organization and grading clarity.

Main concern

Some students report , and grading that feels subjective.

What students said

“Take his class if you can!!! , and super interesting.”
ENG1B
“Although he's a and .”
ENG1C
“If you try and work with him you'll get the A”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam policy, and .

Essay HeavyQuizzes MentionedNo Final Mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments mention quizzes, midterms in one older review, and , but they do not prove a .

Quizzes MentionedMidterms MentionedNo Final Mentioned
“ and questions in study guides are reiterated on the midterms.”
ENG1B
“ . .”
ENG1B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Take his class if you can!!! , and super interesting.”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Great teacher, caring, and super interesting.”

⚖️

55/100

“He gives you whatever grade he wants at the end and definitely plays favorites.”

📚 Workload Reality

58/100

“Not a lot of work and plenty of time to prepare for essays.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing teacher! Passionate and knowledgable about his subject.
  • Talks a lot, good story teller and reader.
  • . very judgemental, and gets off topic very easily.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Effort

  • If you try and work with him you'll get the A
  • Good grade as long as you participate.
  • I got a C+ and I worked my butt off.

Theme 3

🧭 About Structure

  • and
  • he doesnt stick to syllabus, so go to class .
  • No prompt or

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is based on 34 in-person reviews across many years with , and organization.

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 56
3 out of 54
2 out of 55
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG1B10 reviews
ENG1A9 reviews
ENG1C4 reviews
ENGL1A3 reviews
ENGL1B2 reviews
Show 6 more courses
ENGL64081 review
ENGLI1BC1 review
ENGLIH1B1 review
ENGLISH1A1 review
ENGLISH1B1 review
HIST1C1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 5

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values