AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Theodore Jenkins

MAT25 · MATH520 · MATH510 · MATH61 · MATH450 · MATH25 · MATH410 · MATH401 · 47 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
15.91%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you can handle a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProOverwhelming HomeworkSelf-Taught CourseConfusing LecturesTough TestsHeavy Online Platforms
  • Students repeatedly describe extreme homework volume across formats.
  • Many reviews say lectures are unfocused and students must teach themselves.
  • A , but most strongly warn against taking him.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Some students earned A grades, but reviews consistently say the grade requires huge time, self-teaching, and .

Online includes one easy dosage-calculation review, but both formats mostly report heavy work for grades.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The math itself is often described as difficult, fast, or unsupported by lectures.

Online students emphasize self-study, while and heavy online work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Several reviews mention required check-ins, never missing class, or .

Online evidence includes Canvas check-ins, while but often not useful.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

Most students strongly warn against taking him because workload and teaching style create a poor experience.

Both formats are mostly negative, with only a few positive reviews from students who could manage the work.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Grades are possible, but , and high effort requirements.

Format shift

Online has a few clear grading comments, while and grading.

Workload

Overwhelming

5/100

as hundreds or thousands of problems.

Format shift

Both formats report overwhelming work, with .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students often describe lectures as off-topic, confusing, or absent, with the course becoming self-taught.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on no real teaching, while and poor structure.

Assessment method

Balanced

61/100

, and online tests.

Format shift

Online appears platform-heavy, while , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

lectures, unclear projects, and tough exams.

Main concern

Students say the workload consumes time and lectures .

What students said

“Everything is mainly online and you're teaching yourself.”
MATH401
“Expect to spend several hours per .”
MATH25

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe a mostly self-taught class run through paid platforms with .

Main concern

Students report limited teaching, paid software, check-ins, and high workload.

What students said

“ .”
MATH401
“He assigns 6 assignments per week with 120 questions AND every single question is like 3-6 parts!”
MATH25

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

homework-supported tests but many complaints about difficult and .

Open Book EvidenceHomework-Based TestsTest HeavyFinal In Person Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

44/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly mention some online exams, open-book midterms, and an , but .

Open Book MidtermsOnline TestsIn-Person Final
“ so you can look at the homework and textbook.”
MATH25
“The .”
MATH410

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or .

Final Heavy EvidenceHomework-Based Tests
“This class is as it is worth 80% of your grade so its pass or fail with it.”
MATH25
“Homework and on the tests.”
MATH410

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you value your sanity or have stuff outside of school such as work or even .”

Voice snapshots generated from 48 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Overload

5/100

“Expect to spend several hours per .”

👨‍🏫 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Jenkins did not teach one thing at all.”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

16/100

“Would not reccomend for your own sanity.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • An unbelievable amount of homework that consists of like 50-60 questions and in class he doesn't even go over the homework.
  • He gives an insane amount of .
  • There was between 400 to 600 problems a week on web assign.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • In person he goes into tangents 100% of the time, I wish I was being dramatic.
  • .
  • His lectures are un related and long.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams And Grades

  • The .
  • version of each problem.
  • This class is as it is worth 80% of your grade so its pass or fail with it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

48

Recent reviews read by the AI

47

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 48 reviews over many years show unusually consistent complaints about workload and teaching.

Inside 48 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 54
3 out of 55
2 out of 510
1 out of 525

Course coverage

MATH2511 reviews
MATH40110 reviews
MATH4109 reviews
MATH5207 reviews
MATH4505 reviews
Show 3 more courses
MATH5104 reviews
MAT251 review
Math-611 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

36 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 2 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 2 · B- 2

C range

7

C+ 1 · C 5 · C- 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

12

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 2