AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Melissa Medich

ANTHRO287949 · ANTH02 · ANTH84535 · ANTHRO1L · ANTH102F · ANTH1 · ANTHRO1 · ANTHRO3 · BIOANTHRO1 · ANTHRO86694 · ANTHRO06473 · ANTH95110 · 45 lifetime ratings

AI rating
63/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
55.56%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take her if you can follow detailed formatting rules and keep up with lectures, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture HeavyStrict APA FormattingExtra Credit AvailablePassionate LecturerHeavy Reading and Papers
  • Students are sharply split between calling her passionate and and inflexible.
  • , and deadlines drive most negative experiences.
  • Many successful students say the class is manageable with reading, lectures, slides, and steady work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

An A is possible with , and deadlines, but mistakes can be punished heavily.

Online evidence is harsher because several students report zeros for formatting, while in-person students more often mention and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The content is generally understandable, but , and citation rules keep it from being easy.

Online comments emphasize self-paced lecture and reading work, while and class engagement.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Attendance expectations vary by course, with and lecture-based tests make showing up important.

Online attendance is not clearly discussed, while and test preparation.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Students recommend her when they value detailed lectures and , but many warn against harsh formatting and workload.

, while online reviews include more severe complaints about grading flexibility.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

, but APA, citations, and formatting errors can trigger major penalties.

Format shift

Online reviews describe the , while in-person reviews include both strict formatting warnings and praise.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students frequently mention lots of reading, papers, assignments, long lectures, and textbook use.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize papers and reading, while , and many assignments.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Many students praise her passion, knowledge, and detailed lectures, but some and .

Format shift

, while online feedback is more mixed and .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment , and written assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize papers, formatting, and tests, while in-person , and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are more positive overall, praising passionate lectures, , and clear expectations, though workload and .

Main concern

, and written work require consistent effort.

What students said

“She offers a lot of opportunities.”
ANTHRO1
“Just make sure to show up because as attendance.”
ANTHRO3

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are polarized, with some students finding lectures clear and grades manageable while and .

Main concern

Strict formatting and citation rules can cause severe grade penalties.

What students said

“ and very strict on formatting.”
ANTHRO06473
“As long as you download the and watch the lectures, you should get a good grade.”
ANTHRO1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and some pop quizzes, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or closed-book requirements.

Lecture-Based TestsPop Quizzes MentionedPicture Tests MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and pop quizzes, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Lecture-Based TestsPop QuizzesFair Tests Mentioned
“ so it's to your benefit to be there.”
ANTHRO3
“Fair Tests. and slides.”
ANTH95110

Online

and hard picture tests, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home rules.

Lecture-Based TestsPicture Tests MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Pretty much all of the and key word definitions.”
ANTH1
“ .”
ANTHRO1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if Anthro-1 is required on your career path!”

Voice snapshots generated from 45 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“Professor Medich is an amazing and inspirational professor.”

⚖️

32/100

“ and very strict on formatting.”

📚 Workload Reality

30/100

“There is a total of 40 assignments for the whole course.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and her lectures are very through, as are her PowerPoints.
  • She made the long lectures interesting, and she is very knowledgeable on the material she teaches.
  • Clear and understandable lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Not an easy A.
  • As long as , and study, it should be an easy A.
  • Gave lots of opportunities.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload and Rules

  • No MLA format or else you will get a zero all all the assignments.
  • Every single point matters so make .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

45

Recent reviews read by the AI

45

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

There are 45 reviews across many years and both formats, with consistent , and formatting.

Inside 45 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 524
4 out of 55
3 out of 54
2 out of 50
1 out of 512

Course coverage

ANTH102F8 reviews
ANTHRO18 reviews
ANTHRO38 reviews
ANTHRO064735 reviews
ANTH951104 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ANTH13 reviews
ANTH022 reviews
ANTH845352 reviews
BIOANTHRO12 reviews
ANTHRO1L1 review
ANTHRO2879491 review
ANTHRO866941 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

36 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 1 · A 9 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

12

F 12

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 2