AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Robert Campbell

STAT10 · MATH510 · MATH425 · MATH165 · MATH65A · MATH25 · STATS10 · MATH410 · 47 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Strongly consider him, especially if math is not your strength and you are .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear Step-by-Step TeachingBeginner Friendly MathFunny and CaringFair TestsHomework Required
  • Students overwhelmingly describe him as , and supportive.
  • He is especially strong for students who struggle with math and .
  • Grades require homework and studying, but and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

He makes , and fair tests, but students still need to study and do homework.

Online reviews sound a bit smoother and more painless, while , and studying.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Math content can be challenging, but .

Both formats praise clear explanations, with and in-person students highlighting live review and examples.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

, but students say missing class causes lost material and hurts success.

, while in-person evidence more clearly says skipping class makes success harder.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and less intimidating.

Both online and especially broad and consistent.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

72/100

He gives credit for , and fair tests, but does not hand out grades without work.

Format shift

Online grading sounds straightforward, while as fair but and studying.

Workload

Moderate

56/100

and sometimes daily or weekly, but students usually describe it as manageable and useful.

Format shift

Online workload is described as required assignments and videos, while , and review work.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Reviews consistently praise his clear explanations, patience, humor, organization, and willingness to help.

Format shift

Online and in-person evidence spanning many years.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Grades appear , and participation-style work depending on the course.

Format shift

Online reviews mention assignments and participation, while in-person , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews consistently praise clear lectures, humor, patience, office support, and fair assessments.

Main concern

, and studying matter because math can still be difficult.

What students said

“He truly wants everyone to understand and pass.”
MATH425
“ , but they were fair.”
MATH425

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews are very positive, praising organized , and strong support.

Main concern

Students still need a basic algebra foundation and active participation.

What students said

“His online website was easy to understand and very straight forward.”
MATH25
“I took his online class, be talkative and you'll be fine!”
STAT10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually described as fair and studyable, but not automatically easy.

Fair TestsStudy Guides MentionedHomework-Based Test PrepFew Major Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, quizzes, midterms, and finals, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Fair TestsStudy GuidesQuizzesMidtermFinal
“ and the final.”
MATH425
“ , but they were fair.”
MATH510

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, take-home, quiz format, midterm format, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A if math is not your forte.”

Voice snapshots generated from 47 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“ so clearly and will even tell you to star certain problems that are identical on the , and the final.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“If you struggle with math (like me) this is your man.”

⚖️ Fair Assessment

72/100

“The , but he reviews the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He went over the homework and showed us how to do each problem step by step.
  • He truly wants everyone to understand and pass.
  • He is extremely helpful and understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • You will need to work for your letter grade.
  • The if you study and do your part.
  • Doing the Hw is a must or you will fall behind and .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • to pass.
  • and willing to help with anything.
  • He starts each lecture full of energy with a joke.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

47

Recent reviews read by the AI

47

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

There are 47 reviews across a long time span, and the positive themes are highly consistent despite a few dissenting comments.

Inside 47 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 537
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH42516 reviews
MATH41011 reviews
MATH259 reviews
STAT105 reviews
MATH5102 reviews
Show 4 more courses
4251 review
MATH1651 review
MATH65A1 review
STATS101 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

30 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 5

B range

14

B+ 1 · B 7 · B- 6

C range

6

C+ 2 · C 4

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Not_Sure_Yet 1