AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Jeri Bollman

CDE2 · CDE415 · CD26 · CDE1 · CDE4 · CDE198114 · CDE7 · CD2 · CDCD2 · CD415 · CD5896 · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
61.11%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you value passionate lectures and can follow strict instructions, but if you need a consistently warm or flexible professor.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate lecturerStrict expectationsCan seem rudeEasy courseworkNo late work
  • many praise Jeri Bollman as passionate, funny, and informative, while others describe her as rude or .
  • The coursework is often called easy, but strict , and unclear expectations can make the experience stressful.
  • and strong critics, while online reviews are more negative about help and communication.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

The work itself is often easy, but students must attend, follow exact instructions, and .

Both formats mention easy work, but online reviews add and poor help.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Child development content is usually described as , and not hard, though fast-track pacing and .

In-person students more often praise lectures and easy content, while online students are more divided on clarity and support.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Reviews repeatedly say students must show up, be on time, and cannot rely on late work or missed lectures.

, while online evidence stresses regular logins and deadlines.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

She is recommended by students who like strict, passionate teaching, but many others warn that her tone and support style are hard to handle.

In-person recommendations are polarized, while online recommendations are weaker because communication complaints are frequent.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Students often report , and point deductions, even though grades can be good when rules are followed.

Format shift

Strictness appears in both formats, with and in-person reviews emphasizing no late work and exact specifications.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload is usually described as easy or manageable, but presentations, reflections, syllabus tracking, and fast-track pacing can add pressure.

Format shift

Online workload sounds calm in positive reviews but frustrating when help is needed, while but rule-bound.

Teaching experience

Average

66/100

She is often praised as passionate and knowledgeable, but repeated complaints about rudeness and .

Format shift

but includes strong praise, while online feedback has more consistent complaints about communication.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Grades appear based on assignments, reflections, presentations, participation, and exams rather than only tests.

Format shift

Online reviews mention lectures and assignments, while in-person reviews mention reflections, presentations, exams, class activities, and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are polarized, with many students loving her passion and lectures while others warn she can be rude, strict, and .

Main concern

Students need to attend, track the syllabus, ask carefully, and meet strict expectations with no late work.

What students said

“Her class was very easy. Show up, do your reflections, and keep track of your syllabus.”
CDE1
“The coursework was very easy. though.”
CD2
“Strict, will NOT accept any late work, all work must be done to her specific specifications.”
CD415

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed to negative, with easy work and but repeated complaints about rudeness, vague help, and .

Main concern

Online students most often complain that .

What students said

“overall work was really easy but .”
CDE1
“This is a calm class and and regularly log on and you'll be fine.”
CDE1
“ and does not give good feedback.”
CDE7

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because some students call tests and the , but reviews do not provide enough detail for a highly student-friendly label.

Easy FinalEasy TestsExam Content From ClassPresentations

Assessment risk

Standard

67/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and exam content tied to class work, but do not clearly prove book policy or proctoring rules.

Easy FinalEasy TestsExam Content From Class
“ ever taken.”
CDE4
“One .”
CDE1
“because all work is in the exams.”
CD415

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I can't say enough GOOD things about this professor!! !”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

66/100

“Her lectures are full of passion and humor.”

⚖️

34/100

“She means it when .”

👍 Recommendation Split

58/100

“The coursework was very easy. though.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Bollman is very passionate about what she does.
  • She really knows her stuff and makes the material very interesting for us to learn.
  • She can be rude and high maintenance especially when you ask questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Her class was very easy. Show up, do your reflections, and keep track of your syllabus.
  • Strict, will NOT accept any late work, all work must be done to her specific specifications.
  • DO ALL YOUR WORK EVERYTHING COUNTS

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • Having questions for her is like death.
  • She answers emails within 24 hours.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 33 reviews across a long time span, with enough detail to show stable strengths and recurring interpersonal concerns.

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 57
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CDE113 reviews
CD25 reviews
CDE24 reviews
CDE42 reviews
CDE4152 reviews
Show 7 more courses
823071 review
CD261 review
CD4151 review
CD58961 review
CDCD21 review
CDE1981141 review
CDE71 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 4 · A 6 · A- 2

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1