AI Rate Professor

Reading

Jacquelyn Ford

ENGL550 · ENGL1B · ENGL1A · ENG475 · READ550 · 1B · ENG1B · ENGLISH475 · EN475 · READ6642 · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
17/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
20.83%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid her online sections unless , and a high workload.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHeavy readingUnclear feedbackPolarizing teachingParticipation matters
  • Recent online reviews are , and rude communication.
  • humor, energy, and growth in reading or writing.
  • The class can reward effort in person, but online students report high grade risk and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible, especially in older in-person reviews, but students repeatedly , and .

Online reviews make an A look very difficult, while students.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course content and workload are challenging because students mention lots of reading, many papers, and .

Online students emphasize difficulty and confusion more strongly than in-person students, who often call the work manageable if prepared.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Attendance and participation appear important, with and others warning that skipping hurts grades.

The , while online reviews focus more on lectures and grading.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most recent reviews strongly warn against taking her, despite several older in-person students recommending her.

Online reviews are overwhelmingly anti-recommendation, while and student fit.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough grader and , and .

Format shift

, while in-person reviews still often describe her as tough but sometimes fair.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Reviews frequently mention lots of , and preparation demands.

Format shift

and work, but online reviews describe it as more frustrating and punishing.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Recent students often , and rude communication, though some older in-person reviews praise her energy and support.

Format shift

Online teaching experience is mostly poor, while and more positive in older reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades appear driven , and occasional quizzes or tests.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on essays and grading disputes, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed but often more positive, with older students , and and writing.

Main concern

Expect , and active participation.

What students said

“She is also hard on you but .”
ENG475
“ ”
READ550
“ and you'll pass with an A”
READ550

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, with repeated complaints , and communication problems.

Main concern

Students report and .

What students said

“grades like its the military”
ENGLISH475
“ .”
ENGL1A
“ .”
ENGL550

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention pop quizzes, tests, essays, and , but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, Lockdown Browser, or .

Pop QuizzesTestsEssay-Based Grading

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or .

Pop QuizzesTestsReading-Based Quizzes
“She gives pop quizzes .”
READ550
“Study for her tests and you will do fine :)”
READ550

Online

Online reviews focus on essays, Canvas submissions, lectures, and grading, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or .

Essay-Based GradingCanvas Submission Issues
“I couldn't turn in ”
EN475
“She gave me A on rough draft and a .”
ENGL550

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Ford is awful. useful feedback.”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“This professor is not ”

⚖️

12/100

“grades like its the military”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“the amount of combined”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a terrible teacher.
  • Ms. Ford is a great teacher.
  • She is also hard on you but .
  • She made me want to come to class every day

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • She does grade harshly sometimes
  • if you read the material.
  • and you'll pass with an A

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • Tone in communications comes off as harsh and rude.
  • .
  • she was condescending.
  • and makes class fun

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

There are 39 reviews across many years and both formats, with a .

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 55
1 out of 515

Course coverage

ENGL1A10 reviews
ENG4758 reviews
READ5507 reviews
ENGLISH4753 reviews
1B2 reviews
Show 6 more courses
EN4752 reviews
ENGL5502 reviews
READ66422 reviews
4751 review
ENG1B1 review
ENGL1B1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 3

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

5

C+ 3 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 6 · Rather not say 2