AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Kent McCorkle

CHEM10 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take him if you want strong chemistry preparation and can handle heavy online assignments, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrong Chemistry ExplanationsHeavy Online HomeworkExtra Credit AvailableMixed ResponsivenessTest Heavy
  • Most and support, but two online reviews describe poor responsiveness and outsourced course structure.
  • The course can produce high grades because of , but the workload is often heavy.
  • , though as important and sometimes not fully aligned with instruction.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

High grades and are common, but students repeatedly say the A requires keeping up with a .

Online evidence shows with heavy work, while the single in-person review supports fair but .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

67/100

Students often say chemistry becomes understandable, though the online structure and test alignment can make the course feel harder.

Online reviews are mixed on structure, while the understand.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

The reviews do not clearly describe an , and most evidence comes from online sections.

Online reviews do not mention attendance requirements, and the single .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

, but several online students warn about workload and responsiveness.

Online recommendations are polarized, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

and mostly high reported grades .

Format shift

Online reviews mention repeatedly, while the in-person review describes tough but .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Multiple online reviews describe 12 or more , and an .

Format shift

Online workload is clearly heavy, while the .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most students praise his explanations and chemistry teaching, but a few online reviews describe lazy structure and poor email support.

Format shift

, while the in-person review is positive.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and test-heavy tags, so assessment appears to mix assignments and tests.

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes homework platforms and tests, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The , and accountability.

Main concern

and strict expectations.

What students said

“He makes it easy to understand the materials and will tell you what you did wrong.”
CHEM-10

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are strongly split between excellent teaching with and frustration with heavy Macmillan or Achieve workload.

Main concern

and inconsistent online responsiveness.

What students said

“He offloads his entire course onto MacMillan and assigns 12+ hmw each week.”
CHEM-10
“He really cares about his students, very responsive, gives , grades quickly.”
CHEM-10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and test-heavy structure, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Test HeavyExam Details Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The or proctoring policy.

Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Online reviews mention tests, including questions not taught and test-heavy tags, but do not clearly .

Test HeavyPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“adding questions on the .”
CHEM-10
“HW on Achieve is harder than the exams.”
CHEM-10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you can handle the work, he's probably the chem classes.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ click/ stick.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“He offloads his entire course onto MacMillan and assigns 12+ hmw each week.”

📈 Grade Value

68/100

“He offers opportunities every week and they can help a lot if you do them.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This man is a natural-born teacher!
  • !
  • He makes it easy to understand the materials and will tell you what you did wrong.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Deadlines were tough with many assignments.
  • I will say so keep that in mind.
  • He also offloads pretty much all the work onto a paid program.

Theme 3

💬 About Support

  • He .
  • He really cares about his students, very responsive, gives , grades quickly.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seven recent reviews across online and and mostly course-specific evidence, though online opinions are polarized.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM-106 reviews
395091 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values