AI Rate Professor

Photography

Meital Yaniv

PHOTO7 · PHOTO10 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take Yaniv if you want a and rewards improvement.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring mentorHelpful feedbackCreative growthRedo-friendly gradingTime-consuming projects
  • Both students gave perfect quality ratings and .
  • The online .
  • The in-person darkroom class is more stressful and time-consuming but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

High grades are very attainable because online students can redo work and the .

Online evidence is more grade-friendly due to redo opportunities, while and critique effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The class is approachable with support, but photography process work and critiques can be stressful and time-consuming.

Online work may be easier after revisions, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews , though the in-person studio format likely benefits from participation.

, so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

because the class is caring, helpful, and focused on improvement.

Both online and help and in-person emphasizing growth through critique.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Redo opportunities and strong .

Format shift

Online grading is explicitly generous, while critique.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload is manageable but can be time-consuming, especially for .

Format shift

, while in-person workload is stress and time in the process.

Teaching experience

Excellent

97/100

Students describe Yaniv as inspiring, caring, helpful, and constructive even when critiques are tough.

Format shift

Both formats show strong teaching, with online support and in-person critique helping students improve.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and redo work rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats appear assignment-centered, and no review clearly mentions exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The in-person review describes a stressful and help and critiques.

Main concern

The darkroom process and critiques can feel demanding for beginners.

What students said

“This class can be a little stressful and .”
Photo-10
“Meital was a little tough in Critiques but I felt it was helpful to improve your work or help you understand the project.”
Photo-10

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The online review describes a very helpful, caring class with redo opportunities that .

Main concern

.

What students said

“ but they'll let you redo the .”
Photo-7
“ and if you ever need help.”
Photo-7

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exams, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

No Clear Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , closed-book rules, midterm format, or .

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Super great experience.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and creative workload; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

97/100

“ and if you ever need help.”

⚖️

90/100

“ but they'll let you redo the .”

📈 Challenge Level

58/100

“This class can be a little stressful and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Meital was very inspiring and caring when entering this class.
  • and .

Theme 2

📸 About Projects and Growth

  • but they'll let you redo the .
  • Meital was a little tough in Critiques but I felt it was helpful to improve your work or help you understand the project.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there are only 2 reviews, even though both are recent, detailed, and consistent.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

Photo-101 review
Photo-71 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values